…it's still distilled.

Well, you could just list the opposite of what the guy above you said. Instead of strong female characters, there were sexualized, character-less sets of tits. A lot of it is a rehash of awful '90s comics. Editorial control was too tight. On top of that they tried to stuff 15-20 years of comics history in to 5 years.…

When did you grow up?

Well, you're fucking nuts.

Finished this last night. EXCELLENT book.

Finished this last night. EXCELLENT book.

"This could have been done with instead of having the chapters narrated by Amy, if we were just presented chapters of "Amazing" that supposedly tell her side of the story."

"This could have been done with instead of having the chapters narrated by Amy, if we were just presented chapters of "Amazing" that supposedly tell her side of the story."

Aye Aye, Zombie!

That's hilarious.

Pretend that right here I posted that video of him leaping over a chair in an interview. Hilarious.

HAHAHAHA OH MY GOD

lol

As a guy dating a teacher, and whose mom is a teacher, and whose close friend is a teacher, and whose cousin is a teacher, I feel pretty confident saying common core is bullshit.

"Daniel Dae Lee" ahahahahahahaha.

They should just do the ol' switcheroo! Jon Stewart does the nightly news, Brian Williams does The Daily Show.

"Obysmal"? Seriously?

I think it's more that the two scenes wouldn't be shot identically. The scene with the woman might be, for example, a low rear angle instead, so you can get her ass in the shot. Or it'll be slightly more in profile, so you can see her breasts strain against her shirt. And shit like that.

It would depend entirely on how big the boobs were. Dude looooved boobs.

It beats filling out TPS reports.