So when people say things like "quantum internet" (not when articles say it, but when actual scientists working on this do), they're not talking about a means of classical communication, but rather more of a protocol for communication that will still require classical channels?

So then it's down to a comprehension about the speed of light. I forget that its max speed is absolute, so light traveling at 1.5c due to shifting frames isn't how it works. That makes a lot more sense, though my brain is still insisting that it's the 1900s and it's totally the same thing as the sound. I had this…

so all this is really useful for is securing communications? As great as that is, it's also kind of a let down.

So you can't set the spin and have the other side see the change? It always has to start in a superposition? So, essentially, the entanglement allows them to collapse to opposing spins consistently. I get why that's useless as a communications medium. Now if I could just wrap my head around the causality thing…

I understand that I'm just not getting it, but even with the instantaneous communication I don't see how Eve is able to effect change inside the car. Her receiving the information about Bob having seen the light and getting the message are the result of light hitting Bob, and Eve observing that after the fact. …

I'm reading through the page on the Tachyonic antitelephone. I think I just don't understand the concepts of things like time dilation sufficiently to fully grasp the concept. The two way communication example is helping out a bit, but I'm pretty sure I'm just not well versed enough on the subject to get. I think a…

So...quantum information is still being transmitted faster than the speed of light. Verification of the quantum information requires classical information which has to come over classical channels. If I'm reading the bulleted list on wikipedia right (and assuming it's correct and didn't lose too much dumbing it down…

Transmitting classical information requires classical channels. Transmission of quantum information is faster than the speed of light. Check out the wiki page on quantum information. I'm not a quantum physics expert or anything; however, it would appear that the barrier for FTL transmission of classical information…

Pretty sure you're conflating speed and throughput. The speed is instantaneous (i.e. faster than the speed of light).

Some are pull to flash push to turn on, others are push to flash, pull to turn on, and some are pull only for both. Just pick one and stick with it.

I spent several minutes trying to locate the fuel filler release on a rented Chrysler 300 last week. Eventually found it inside the driver's door map pocket. W.T.F? Rented another car last year (can't remember what model, just had to get the cheapest available per my company's travel restrictions at the time) where…

I fear this styling catching on. The face on this car says 'wat' harder than most people's meme posters.

So...you believe that buses are safer than self driving cars even though you start the article by pointing out that people are the cause of 90% of the accidents? The self driving car would be a safer alternative to the buses.

So...there's empty space where fog lights would normally go because the moved the fog lights into the grill? I'd prefer they move to the slots that were made for them and it have a clean grill.

nah, that's a long way off...first they'll take away our in-city privileges, then eventually the freeways, and in a good century or so, them 'pulicans will have pushed us enthusiasts out to the tracks. Really, I've got a feeling that both sides of the political spectrum are going to be aligned in pushing self driven…

That's what I'm saying. Skip all of the 20,000 leagues, call up Icarus, and get your Cav some wings (not the RedBull kind).

driving across the water is hard. So diving to the Dominican Republic for the weekend is more difficult than it should be. Flying cars could fix that, and with this autonomy, I could skip the hassle of hiring a pilot.

One step closer to flying cars.

Right, the point of my comment was to express that I was in favor of AWD when I started reading, but on having read Chris_K_F's comment, I'm now not so sure the AWD is as good of an idea as I'd initially thought. It wasn't mean as a negative comment on the SH-AWD system. The STI was simply referenced as a non-suv…

Came here to whine about the price kick pushing it out of the spirit of the S series, leaving satisfied and also now on the fence about the AWD. I really like AWD when done correctly (STi), but if it makes the car heavier and more expensive, then ditch it and stick with RWD.