Because they are an unbelievably small percentage of the population, and the odds of any single one person being unbelievably good at athletics are already very small to begin with.
Because they are an unbelievably small percentage of the population, and the odds of any single one person being unbelievably good at athletics are already very small to begin with.
No, those are reasonable people who understand the implications of allowing people who are biologically men to compete with women.
Are you gaslighting me or are you just that obtuse? Your fundamental claim is that trans women are essentially “biologically male” and have bodies similar enough to cis men as to constitute a clear case of unfair advantage.
Insisting that I provide a study about trans athletes and their performances is stupid goal-post…
I didn’t say parents did I? Nope. My parents and I are just fine tyvm. Nor did I say they were ashamed. Who is being snotty and sanctimonious now?
You should reread my post and see the link I provided, or you could just google it. Sorry, you can’t say the science is on your side when it’s not.
Furthermore, you’re making claims beyond sports, claims such as the general bone density of trans women after transitioning. Not only are there multiple, easily searchable…
Does the ability to give birth define womanhood / female-ness / femininity in your eyes? Because that’s certainly not an argument I’d make.
These “first-wave feminists” are okay with buddying up with the men who’d strip women, especially young WOC, of their reproductive rights and other civil rights because:
They’re basically misogynists. They view women as inherently weaker and more fragile than men. It’s just fundamentalist Christianity without God. Actually its Catholicism without God; Janice Raymond was a former nun and she was clearly still influenced by that.
The fundamental problem I have with biological determinism is that it assumes — it must assume — that being male or female has a single valid range of expression.
I believe you mean FARTs:
As far as I can tell, they think they’re addled butch women, who have been brainwashed by the Trans Agenda into thinking they’re not good enough as women, or that butchness / lesbianism is shameful.
This was one of the most difficult things to read. I have so many trans people in my life, reading about such enduring and targeted hatred towards them - particularly from a group that should be counted as sisters and allies - is nauseating.
We’re so absolutely downright uncommon. There aren’t enough of us!
I cannot agree MORE with you. The idea of women’s bathrooms as some sort of exotic, seduction-adjacent oasis is nonsensical. Yo, we go in, we relieve ourselves, we wash our hands, maybe we freshen up the lipstick. If we’re in a group, we’ll probably talk about somebody who’s not in the group. And then we LEAVE!
I could barely read this over my own internal screaming. Does WoLF not see the snide smirking of the Tucker Carlson’s of the world as they do their hateful work for them? They are being played.
If trans women were really women, they would understand that the issue is male violence and they would sit down with us and civilly work together with us to find an acceptable solution to this problem.
More like the UK media is OVER-representing TERF thinking, and therefore helping to platform and “validate” it.
Please stop calling them feminists or radical because they are neither.
The bathroom issue is so bizarre to me. I’ve been in A LOT of women’s bathrooms in my time, and let me tell you! THEY ARE GROSS! They are the opposite of sexy! I’m sure it happens but it’s also a REALLY BAD place to go all sexual predator on someone because they’re usually busy and have a lot of foot traffic, there’s…
Obligatory contrapoints links