Outraged people: He didn’t apologize!

You will likely take a lot of flack for this post but thank you for the thoughtful post.

Arquette makes more money than 99.99% of the US population.

You should try outrage masturbating.  Best of both worlds.

I disagree with you so I must be a shill for the oil companies. Disingenuous argument much?

Okay. Let’s follow the logic. Do all States have to have the same tax rates? All municipalities the same sales tax? All school districts the same property taxes? And on and on...that is the only way a truly even regulatory playing field would be achieved.

The fracking in the Colorado Front Range directly drives its economic growth. That’s the and.

And how many of these happen a year?  A semi-truck exploded on the highway over the summer.  Maybe we should ban those too.  

I can’t speak to the other initiatives: The Colorado fracking limits would have been a near fracking ban that had very little science backing it to explain why it was safer than the current fracking set back. Essentially the thought was: the current 500 feet has been demonstrated to be safe so half a mile has to be…

This is a far more complicated issue than ‘evil landlords’ versus the poor. Landlords can only charge what the market will pay.

Cats have only been let into households the last 50 years or so. They are just barely domesticated. Cats in RDR2 would have lived in barns to kill off mice and are not the domesticated animals we think of today.

Instead of jamming firearms (which is stupid), simply make ammo scarce.  

Entered this thread just to see if it was A Whole New World. Yep. Did not disappoint.

If she was fearful (as the uncomfortable claim implies) of him, she would not have put herself in close physical proximity to him. She was a racist on a power trip. Nothing more. Nothing less.

This reminds me of the Witcher author. Who signed away ALL the video game rights to the Witcher. The game studio offered him royalties. He turned it down and asked for an upfront payday.

Yeah. I told you why your argument sucked. Even referenced the logical fallacies you continue to use. You state you addressed my points while continuing not to. Which is the same tactic you used against other posters who pointed out you didn’t address their points. You simply state I’m right because MATH. Okay.

I know what mathematical equality is. And?

Garbage in garbage out: you simply assume your premise that ‘fair’ means an ‘equal’ percentage increase for all unskilled laborers in this case and state you are correct because mathematical provability. As if there is any objective determination of fairness or truth that can assigned to it. When questioned you state…

You are asserting what you think is fair with some weird statement about common acceptance of the governed. Logical Fallacy: argument from authority. You state you are right because the majority (the governed) agree with the position you are forwarding.

All anyone needs to know about your argument in this thread your usage of the term “fair pay”.