Nice change of tack, but it misses the point. I was only discussing the terms employed by the commentariat, not the attitude of the ass himself.

I’m still waiting for actual examples instead of personal opinions on that one.

I actually came up with an entire sentence. Stick with your term if you so wish, despite it not meaning what you want it to mean. bI’m happy when people understand what I say, but if you don’t like to be understood, it squarely is your prerogative.

There indeed is none - as I mentioned in an another answer, the Wiki page does say it covers a rather wide variety of acts. One thing they all have in common however is that all are legal offenses.

I can, because I don’t have a fake beard :-)

Off the top of my head, “lying to a person in order to have sex with them for a year” comes to mind.

Still doesn’t rise to the level of legally actionable “sexual misconduct” level.

Chastain, Malkovich, Farrell and Davis? I’m going to have to see this, despite the very dead horse that is the script.

You have (and that may also be because you’ve seen some Mission: Impossible films, or any other of the myriad ones where some agency decides to hunt - no pun intended - one of its own.)

Oh, Bee is absolutely great!

It’s also misconduct if he contined to have sex with his wife without telling her he was having an affair, because that again would be obtaining sex through deception.

Agreed, on both counts.

Well, I’ll use whatever term accurately describes what happened, and not terms that have actual legal implications not quite warranted by the facts, but thank for the liberty you afford me, it’s appreciated.

Well, the definition - as it were - is so vague that it can mean anything you want. What it does not really seem to cover is relationships between adults (as long as there’s no power imbalance, which does not seem to be the case in this occurrence.)

I guess you’re right. Not exactly a comforting thought though.

Where the f did I say or imply his spouse consented? I of course meant he and the women.

“Some”? Apparently, they’re not judges.

You and I both, then.

Only the sides of the head, apparently. A Brazilian is OK, apparently (possibly because Yahveh hadn’t discovered Brazil yet so He couldn’t form an opinion on their pubic hair trims.)

Like Wikipedia says - sources? Can you point to actual cases where a man lying about his martial status was convicted of abuse, coercion and/or rape?