Your moral objections =/= committing a crime. Pick a criticism and stick to it. All you’ve done through this entire conversation is backpedal and deny your own posts. You are tiresome as fuck.

I didn’t claim she did. You, however, claimed that Elizabeth Warren, a first-term Senator, spearheaded reproductive right policies. You are incorrect.

I think they should be enforced. I think we give powerful men far too much latitude at the expense of women. What sexual harassment law did Hillary Clinton violate?

TL;DR MOAR BOMBS

Elizabeth Warren went to the Senate 12 years after Hillary Clinton. She didn’t “spearhead” those policies any more than any other random Senator.

I’m sorry, but how is her marriage any of your business, and how do you know she “enabled” him? If he is the serial manipulator and abuser of women you and others are claiming he is, why would we not assume that HRC has been victimized as well - we now have to punish her for it? Ridiculous.

Interesting that this issue only comes up when a woman is running. Seriously, no one will even deign to talk about the fact that Ginny Thomas would benefit extraordinarily from the ACA being dismantled (she’s a health care lobbyist) but the alleged actions of a female candidate’s spouse is suddenly relevant? In what…

Omg amazing.

No, Tara Kyle, stricter gun laws would probably not have prevented your husband’s death, or the death of anyone who insists on taking someone they know to be mentally unstable to a firing range. (Looking at you, Nancy Lanza.) That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t have them.

Read this in the voice of Sofia from the Golden Girls. A+.

Less world building, more plot building pls.

Part of it may be mass, part of it is certainly that editors are dwindling and their roles are shrinking in general. But if you have a cash cow like GRRM at your publishing house, I guarantee that you handle their crappy writing with kid gloves.

Haha touche!

This is what happens when writers get too famous: NO ONE EDITS THEM. And holy christ, no one needs an editor more than GRRM.

Dude killed off too many characters and wrote himself into a corner. The best scenario for fans of the series is for him to kick the bucket and have Brandon Sanderson take over.

A+. I am cackling.

But at least they’re union! And give back a lot to the surrounding community!

That’s not the issue at hand here. At all.

Yes, at a certain point, the good you gain from identity representation doesn’t offest the bad of the individual, like a Palin or a Thatcher. But I honestly do not think that is the case here. And if you want to make the argument that representation that reflects the population matters, if you want to claim that women…

Don’t get defensive, huffy, and rude when you get called out for not knowing what you’re talking about. You posited yourself as someone who is familiar with this software. You are not.