Oh, so you can understand words! Couldn’t tell.

Well, as a HRC supporter that doesn’t froth at the mouth, you’ve not given me any reason to vote for Stein. And before you say “You weren’t going to vote for Stein!” in your smuggiest voice possible, you didn’t even give me anything to think about. Hell, I thought more about Perot and Nader than Stein and Johnson!…

That was 8 years ago, before Andrew Wakefield was exposed as a complete and total fraud. Nice try, though.

I’m not wasting my time arguing with idiots who have already made up their minds. I’m guessing you’re like one of those people who just thinks everyone gets honked at while they are driving, as opposed to realizing that they are a terrible driver.

But how can people smugly say that their candidate’s the best?! I mean, there are NO other offices she can run for!!!! She HAS TO BE PRESIDENT! NOTHING MORE NOTHING LESS!!!!!111

Don’t you have some orphans to feed? You know since you are the only person ever to have compassion for poor people.

Pssst—no one is fooled, no one actually believes you responded to “your father and I are very proud” with “my dad’s dead” to test someone’s ability to relate to shared humanity. You were just backed into a corner and trying to make another person feel bad for pointing out that you made yourself look stupid.

Setting aside Stein’s shakey grasp on science and willingness to pander, you’re right. She does have some good ideas.

Her refusing to really confront the fact that her running mate repeatedly referred to President Obama as an “Uncle Tom” was pretty telling as well. She danced around it - badly - when the Washington Post editorial board really tried to pin her down.

I already addressed this. So if it was bad when HRC said it in 2008, how can you champion Jill Stein who is saying it now.

I have doubts about her moral compass. She’s willing to ignore human rights violations (Russia) and sexual assault accusations (Assange), as long as the accused give her attention.

Anyone can run for POTUS. Few can win. It doesn’t matter one little fuck what Stein stands for. She has zero chance of winning.

ETA: Lol at the notion tha career politician Clinton is doing this for “the people” but Stein is simply an attention whore. #itsherturn

Her Brexit bullshit pissed me off so much. She literally changed her policy without mentioning it. Which I guess since no one is interested in Jill Stein’s actual policies it’s not a big deal. She doesn’t own her shit.

You keep writing to people on here who disagree to tell them that they missed your point. If it smells like shit everywhere you go, check under your own shoe.

Her understanding of economics (or rather her lack thereof) is frightening as well. She says “quantitative easing” a lot without knowing what it means—is she still saying that’s her proposal for student debt, quantitative easing? But really that’s just another angle of her pander.

Principals? Stein has none.

Oh be quiet. You’ve repeatedly blathered on with this nonsense. It’s getting old. Now be a good person and trouble us no more.

No, you suggest that the only critique of Stein is that her plans are “impractical.” I don’t think it’s “impractical” that she questions vaccines and nuclear energy, I think it’s bullshit science and I expect better from a doctor.

In a two party system, that’s what the primary is for. And it worked! Bernie’s challenge to HRC drove her to the left on a number of issues. Maybe not all of the issues that you care about, or that I care about, but it had a significant effect.

Now that the primary is over, and the two main parties have picked their…