That IS confusing, because I don’t remember it, and I can’t find my copy of the movie to try and make sense of it.

Hey, you can’t go wrong with brown gravy.

Don’t be jealous.

Brown gravy is the correct sauce for meat loaf. Tomato based sauces are for pasta, pizza, and chicken parmesan.

Why would you trust a grave robber?

I get you, and it’s a good point. It’s just that I think Dick would appreciate the different story, unless he got his knickers in a twist because they didn’t tell HIS story, but instead stole major points from him and did an “inspired by” screenplay. Many (probably most) people are going to have much stronger reaction…

Harry Caray, or Harry Carey?

Audrey was always exquisite, Mamie was just an average looking middle-aged housewife.

I bet you wear white after Labor Day, though;)

It has some crappy ones, too.

The (mad) lips don’t lie!

Do you mean “Deckard as a replicant is the most PK Dick turn the story could take”?

Probably her husband.There are things a bit woman does while dating that end after marriage.

I own the theatrical release and the director’s cut, both are damn fine, but rent the director’s cut.

Showgirls.

Yes, and clearly it was important to Tyrell that Rachel was fooled by her constructed/implanted memories, as well as nearly impossible to detect. There’s no reason the go-to blade runner couldn’t be the same way.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but the movie wasn’t the book. A sequel has to fit with the previous movie, but not necessarily the book.

Not a machine, but a man not born of woman. A genetically engineered human, constructed from human cells.

It was designed into them, so the Tyrell Corporation could easily have made some without that “feature”. They never came across as particularly law abiding.

Christ, I hope not, but it was YOUR scenario. Just be sure and set up a safe word before trying this out in semi-public.