asenseofreason
aSenseOfReason
asenseofreason

First of all, not a take but a factual statement. Second, the article was advocating for vacating a lower courts decision without being briefed on the merits of the case. In this case the question before the court was to stay the decision until the appeals can go through, this was granted. The author advocated that

That’s a fair criticism and I agree with you. CJ Roberts dissented in that case with that exact line of thought. The same argument could be made with the original Roe verdict as well - which was RBG’s criticism of the law. However, reversing a lower court’s decision with out actually hearing the case is an insanely

There are some large factual errors in the reporting here. The first is that the justices should have dismissed the case entirely... they were never asked to. If they did dismiss it entirely that would be a wild abuse of power which would then be used in cases where you disagree with their decision. Courts respond to

Is this sarcasm? How is a social media policy going to kill anyone.... like these people can literally just not log in. Guns literally kill people... social media policies don’t kill anyone.

I don’t think it’s insane to say that children shouldn’t make major medical decisions about themselves with consequences they can’t comprehend as well as saying that child marriage should be illegal...

Clark and Reese are what’s needed to build Women’s sport. It’s brought people in. They’re awesome. This is the only article I’ve read today, out of 7, that has been negative about this. 

What are you talking about? I read the Barstool article and it was like let’s go this is awesome? All reporting was like we now have a new Queen at the top - I haven’t read a single negative reporting piece. Do you not know how to cover sports? She’s considered a hero and a builder of the game... 

NATIONAL CHAMPION

What evidence do you have that anything was escalated? By law, in NY State, an arrest has to be made on complaint. This complaint can happen to medical personnel. You are no comparing this situation to your friend’s situation. No one knows anything and you’re now trying to “read between the lines”. Let this play out

Trying to grab someone’s phone is the literal definition of assault. We know nothing about what happened, why are you trying to compare it to something else?

Could her injuries have happened in him defending his property? We now need to apply a large amount of assumptions on what happened, when none of us know, based on what statistically happens to women? She doesn’t want to press charges. The harm, is from the medical reports, minimal. Things DO happen in relationships

Actual Conservative legal theory should be very pro-abortion. A person making decisions about their body should not be anything the state has influence on. It was weird during COVID when Conservative legal scholars were making pro-abortion legal arguments fighting agains vaccine mandates and Liberal scholars making

I mean it’s undeniable that Top Gun was the first mega-grosser since COVID. It was the first film that said you can have a blockbuster again, people will goto theatres. Way of The Water built on top of that as well. Be as snarky as you want but you need these tentpoles if you’re going to write a check for $100m+ today

All of the evidence of him being shitty should’ve been enough to fire before they actually did. Like none of this stuff was particularly new and to do so now feels incredibly vindictive. The list of people who have said awful things or acted inappropriately at least once is near infinite. Something Something about

This podcast has to be getting ZERO listens. I mean a kooky celebrity who’s not in anything is a pretty tough listen and her co-host being like she keeps it real... she’s 8 months away from celebrity reality TV

Harry wasn’t the star of the film she was directing where they met...

So you’re telling me that a married dad moving half way across the world to be with his much younger starlet employee is a story Jezebel would be saying why are people upset?

You forgot that Jamie Tartt scores the goal

Mr Beast: Let me save 200 people from the Orphan Crushing Machine!

The orphan machine comment is on point but, on the level, isn’t he making the world better. Like is the argument that unless you are entirely focused on systemic change all action is bad? That seems a bit aggressive if you ask me. You can definitely point out that he’s profiting (which I don’t know why profit is bad)