The late 70's early 80's were terrible for cars in general. The oil crises is what forced Ford to drop the 5.0 from the 81/82 Mustang GT. For those two years the 2.3T was the only performance version. The 4.2L V8 was available with an Automatic trans.

Have you driven one? The PT Cruiser Turbo is miles beyond that shitty NA motor.

Comes standard with a 2.0 L NA engine that provides enough power to get the car going and no significant maintenance concerns.

You expect me to settle for a common engine like a V-8? What, do you want me to be mistaken for a poor?

..... oh. :-(

Yearly testing for senior citizens and affordable mass transit. Until then, stories like this one will be all too common.

No.

This was the prototype Ferrari used to develop their novel catching-on-fire feature.

Extremely rare? I’d call that extremely well done.

No.

no

it’s an AWD sports wagon with a v8 and a stick so I’m really wanting to NP but I can’t seem to swallow the miles on this thing, especially the fact current seller says he bought it at 184k and is now getting rid of it 18k later, that right there is a major red flag for me and I therefore have to go CP

So you’re comparing the top 1966 Mustang to a lower trim 2015 Mustang. You might have not quite gotten the question.

Um, you know they make a GT350R right now.

They will all throw rods at roughly the same time and will plow through corners with understeer....

To make Ferrari owners feel a touch of discomfort.

Ford GT. Not based on any real performance factors but they all still have one thing in common: 

Miata is again the answer.

With a selfie-stick, idiot.

Not sure if serious, but if yes, then this is a computer generated image.