I quite agree with you! He’s a nice man, a good politician, and his particular brand of latter day hippie populism goes a long way with the kind of liberal voter who feels that we aren’t nearly cosmopolitan enough. But christ, throwing a Vietnam conscientious objector who honeymooned in the USSR and who apparently…

Totally. With Clinton’s crippling superdelegate reserve he needs big, juicy victories, and that isn’t happening yet. He needs the kind of support that can start peeling those people off, and he’s not getting it. A narrative about political revolution requires that you win big across the board, not nab states where…

That makes way more sense!

And hey now, Rubio has a strong base of support among people who his staffers definitely talked to that one time, just don’t look into it, they’re busy people and can’t always be bothered to fill out ballots or talk to reporters.

So we revile it now for obvious, obvious reasons, but at the time basically everyone thought that crime bill legislation was a super good idea. You basically can’t find a Democrat who didn’t vote for it.

It looks contentious if you look at the for/against numbers in the voting record, but that’s because the Republicans…

Absolutely! Clinton didn’t toast him the way I’m sure she would have liked too. He didn’t walk away with the total sweep, but he took big, notable states and kept a foot in the game.

It’s also worth considering that the NY Times just called Mass for Sanders even though he’s still down about 25k votes. If that holds…

Six. He gained six. Sanders got twenty, Clinton got fourteen. This state is not game changing.

That’s AWESOME.

For sure, and that’s definitely great news for the Sanders ticket. I’m just disputing the idea that taking Oklahoma is a sign of great things to come. He basically held his ground, which is definitely what he needed to do. But with Oklahoma he’s traded a 91 delegate state for a 38 delegate state.

That’s a liiiiittle overoptimistic. He has so far won two states today, one of which he served as a a long term Senator. He stands a real risk of losing Massachusetts, which was supposed to be one of his few strong states today. Colorado and Minnesota are still anyone’s game. I’m certainly not arguing that he’s sunk,…

There’s something eerily fascinating about helicopters, especially up close or in large numbers. Just something bizarrely alien about the way they move and sound.

You know, for some reason that whole concept evoked Far Cry: Flintstones for me, which would actually be amazing.

You know, it’s probably the framerate thing? I don’t have trouble with the other ballistic arc weapons, and my computer generally ran those games at around 30 fps. I had never considered that.

I am a big, big Far Cry fan, but I’m not going to get Primal because it highlights my unspoken secret shame.

That article was fabulous and you deserve all the stars in the milky way for posting it.

Sort of sad to see the spell slot magic system go. I always really enjoy that kind of resource management.

Yeah, receiving a corpse in the mail is a giant pain regardless of how you feel about how it died.

This is why I don’t understand when people try to act like the Trump campaign is somehow this incomprehensible mystery. He has a lot of the same appeal as Sanders, just approached from the opposite side.

That Times article on how seriously the Clinton campaign is taking Trump as an opponent is pretty much the only reassuring part of this. That whole “lol what a joke, we’ll just win” attitude can be terribly dangerous.

Source:

But they will justify it. The people who support him like that he’s an unapologetic racist.

I only have an answer for the first question, because it’s the only part of this nonsense grounded in anything halfway reasonable.