armstrongcraig
NoName
armstrongcraig

Way to go!  I talk to businesses about this all the time.  If they can afford the fees, its a great way for them to offer the lowest cost plans and get a hell of a business expense right off.

Thank you! Financial Planner here. The alternative to the 401k for tax deferral would be an IRA which has FAR lower funding limits. You should take into consideration plan cost too. I’ve seen insane fees, admin costs, expense ratios of 401k in which case the waiting until a match could be argued for.  Ask for the fee

It’s ok. You only need to come up with roughly 215k since they’re paying you $38/barrel to take it off their hands.

What you need is a Kramerica Industries Oil Bladder.  You don’t want an oil spill on your hands.

Its a blog, there is ZERO responsibility to post real data.  If it fits their beliefs they’ll post it regardless of how factual the data is.

Not listing Gabbard.  So no endorsements?

Now playing

I’m sorry but this is the first thing that came to mind.

Tax breaks do create jobs

Now playing

Holy shit, is this Randy Jackson? Will you sign my samurai sword?

I’d totally love for them to pay what I pay but that’s not the current tax code. It incentivizes those that bring most economic benefits, like joh and wealth creation. I’m only stating the obvious that companies will always do what is best for the shareholder because it’s what they are supposed to do. You may be right

Of course Apple is going to wait until it’s financially beneficial to move the money back. Why would they not? They were never going to bring back that much cash back into the US and pay the higher tax rate so why not get something instead of nothing?

Anyone else tired of blowhard politicians? Especially ones from California?

Pick up a coal client! I kid. Agree with you. Tariffs are dumb, always come with blowback from other countries and negatively affect the flow of commerce.

Or, you know, Uber/Lyft

The main take away is this is a conversion from a Traditional IRA to a Roth. You must have first contributed to a Traditional IRA which does have the annual limit imposed on it. The reason there isn’t a limit on the conversion is the individual would have already had the imposed limitation. At least, this is my

This would be a HUGE HIPAA violation. So no, this isn’t our future, unless HIPAA laws are changed.

More expensive than loss of life?

I love your thought but unfortunately, this won’t ever change. These A-holes in power have no reason to make these changes because why would they?