Ah so that’s why I was seeing WoW players talking about Heroes of the Storm and mocking Blizzard’s inability to jump on a trend on time.

I don’t know about “original” but at least since its announcement, years before they cancelled PvE, it was already meant to replace OW1 and not just follow it.

“It shouldn’t have ever been considered a separate game in the first place, and most of the changes were poorly conceived.”

“What I find humorous is when people claim that Sony launching its first-party games on PC day one would be suicidal because nobody would buy them on Playstation.”

I’m a PC player so I’ve only been playing HZD for the past three years and it’s still great. I don’t like the Ubisoft open world formula in general, but HZD is light enough in chores and fighting robot-dinos/animals just feels great. I’ve tried a new playthrough at max difficulty after doing it in NG+ and the gameplay…

“So it behooves us to be accurate. There is no “fact” about the *possibility* of modded BG3 “competing with” a digital WotC platform.”

Once again, it’s not inaccurate, it’s just not literal. Figurative speech isn’t inacurate.

If you take everything literally, sure. But “the fact” has been used to mean  “the idea” or “the hope” when a qualifier of uncertainty is added next to it for as long as I remember. As long as the later is present, it doesn’t hurt the understanding of the sentence.

“But BG3 is already an officially licensed WotC product.”

BG3 is already moddable, but if you add official mods tools with the ability to modify what’s already there, modders will tend to figure out a way to make campaign out of them or even better, tools that can make campaigns.

Hasn’t the guy been an A-lister for a while now? His GoT hype never really died down and Mandalorian basically cemented him as an A-lister.

Yeah this was amazing news (even if it wasn’t completely news, we expected it). I don’t get the negativity. The idea of having BG3 as a basis upon which people might be able to create campaigns is incredible and well worth waiting for.

I wasn’t asking for One Piece Live Action necessarily, but I was excited for it and happy we got it, flaws and all (ant it has many flaws, but it succeed enough at the heart of what it’s trying to adapt that I can both overlook them and hope for a better future).

Like the other poster, I discovered Avatar as an adult so I don’t have fond childhood memories of it, and I can confirm that the LA isn’t even remotely close at least as far as Ep 1 is concerned. The writing is night and day.

I think Live Sokka can act like he should, he just doesn’t. Everyone just uses dramatic pause between every line and is so fricking serious all the time...

They’re what are mostly portrayed in video games, even more so if we go back a decade ago or more when there was even less diversity. I agree that’s an issue, but it’s not the article’s issue imo.

To be fair, for once, I don’t feel clickbaited. The fact that they asked that in 2020 rather than 2024 bears little relevance to the importance of the information, for me at least.

“I think Starfield’s setting is the main issue. It just isn’t all that interesting to most RPG fans.”

Gonna have to sort of disagree. While I think in general people are expecting every game to be a live service which is a disservice (Uh uh) to those games, I do think player count relative to comparable games tell us things.

Subnautica: Below Zero was built entirely on the bones of Subnautica much like the stand alone expansions in the past which also weren’t considered new game.