And we’re going mullet? Come on.
And we’re going mullet? Come on.
These are the worst pants I’ve ever seen.
Interesting to read this a few years down the road looking towards a monster season.
Well if you accept that at some point, those cells constitute a living being that is a baby, it makes a lot more sense. But, go ahead - broad brushstroke all pro-lifers as retarded evil bigots. That’s exactly correct.
Why should they? If they actually committed the crime, fuck them. If they didn’t, then there’s a whole mess of other stuff to talk about. Most of them did though, so I’ll stand by my original: fuck them.
Protein powder shake and a glass of water for me. Gotta try and stay fit, yaknow.
Why pay a bunch of money for an expensive last meal? These people are murderers with victims. Those victims have families. If I had a loved one killed brutally, I wouldn’t really like to know that my tax dollars are partially paying for the killer’s Surf and Turf dinner with a bottle of nice scotch for dinner. Plus,…
Or only apply it in cases where the assurance of guilt and heinousness of the crime is such that we would have no linger feelings of doubt?
Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia is about to doublekill a kid via crucifixion and beheading for participating in anti-government demonstrations when he was 17.
Charles Manson received a death sentence, while never actually murdering any of the victims (that he was tried for - he allegedly killed a few people at Spawn Ranch) while a few of his defendants who actually did the killing were sentenced to life or less. This is common.
A Democrat won’t win the Presidential election, and there will be one more - if not two - Justices appointed during the next administration.
Her wrong was more of a wrong. Her husband was actually innocent, she actually had him killed.
Charles Manson was sentenced to death. I don’t see the problem here.
Yay equality! I dream of a day when women and men both can face the same consequences for the same actions every time.
Do it, but bury it for 50 years. We’ll open it in 25.
To be fair, it seems like y’all love it when people break a law that’s “not right” by your guiding compass, yet jump down the throats of others when they break a law that’s “not right” by their moral rationales. At least have a little consistency...