apriln
April_N_
apriln

I love them as well. That picture isn't my car, but my car looks exactly like that. Well, maybe not as clean.

I didn't see this one submitted... so how about the 1973 Carrera RS. Because race car. Also this is the inspiration (in my mind) for the Singers and the GT3's we love today. It's what Porsche is meant to be.

That's why their profit margins are so flipping high. We can criticize them for not making their fastest car a "hardcore drivers only" car, but they'll be laughing at us all the way to the bank. Which I say, good for 'em, if that means they can stay around and make us more GT3's and Cayman R's.

So here are my two thoughts on this.

So awesome, thank you for sharing!

Yeah no problem. I mean the way I see it, again, almost every industry Journalists get early access to things so they can review it and write their articles, so come launch day, they're ready. This happens in technology, happens in video games, happens with books, etc etc. It's in the interest of the journalist to get

So long as she gets a chance to drive and you bring some cured meats, it's pretty perfect.

1300cc. 13mpg.

The Macan is smaller, and handles better than a Cayenne, plus it is cheaper/faster than a Boxster. It's still a crossover, but it's less off-putting than a Cayenne IMO.

That's not little! That thing is huge! The Macan however...

I love your Type 3! Awesome color.

I actually was going to mention those points along with Chris Harris in my post, but it wound up being to wordy. I don't disagree with you that Ferrari definitely has some deceitful practices, and that there are likely journo's not being completely forthcoming about that information so they'll still be able to cover

I would say that yes they absolutely would still be worthy of being called journalists. They aren't being deceitful, they aren't hiding information, and their opinions or WHAT they write isn't being controlled by another power. They however are essentially choosing to respect the companies wishes to get the product

It is exactly the opposite, and you're 100% correct.

400hp 2.0 TFSI? Either we won't see that in the production car, or the car is going to cost $80k

Looks pretty similar to me....

Haha, fair enough. At least you're honest.

Did you enjoy the video?

Please tell me there is a video? Please can I have the video?

That jacket tho