this is the best response here

This is like a weird attempt to imitate what he thinks a pro-life conservative must be like.
Now that its totally backfired and they’re condeming this POS he is probably in a board room yelling at some intern for not telling him that this is a crazy position to have -

in Islamic theocracies and autocracies, how many women have the agency yo choose “no hijab”?

bullshit!

didn’t it feel like it lasted forever though?

Its notable that every pro-life organization in Tennessee opposed the legislation in the first place, precisely because of the incentive to abort

something tell me the guy with the car elevator got over it pretty quick

“Hi guys, I was really inspired by this Rob Ford piece. But just to clarify for a friend, does this advice also apply to jurists who were well-respected by his peers on both sides of the aisle.”

reading that statement it sounds pretty non-commital. Basically, “we dont want to say were against the bill now, but we want to reserve the right to say we opposed it if it actually becomes a bigger thing”

But is there a way to figure out if youre racist?

having 8 justices isnt a problem and it has a lot of precedent. The term is nearly over and if hearings are held in January then any cases requiring a rehearing can be reheard.

The reaction to the republican’s blatant attempt to score points and distort history should not be for us to do the same and claim that a…

people have run with worse. You just would have to work so hard that it might not be worth it

this might be the least scientific study of wage disparity ever

if youre from the other party and presumably it’s non-controversial (like the new guy won electoral AND popular vote without a SCOTUS decision) then you could try it, but all those Senators looking at the national fervor will be like “hell nah”

I think you have more trust in Hillary’s campaign promises than most . Specific ones like these are most easily subject to a “change in circumstances”

After they elect Hillary Clinton president??? No she is not gonna let her people take that from her

not sure i follow. You’re telling me if the Dems (1) Win the senate; (2) Elect Hillary as president, that Obama could get a nomination through in 2.5 months? And that HRC would just be cool with him taking her nomination away?

No that’s dumb

when you reach actual lame duck status your own party won’t let you nominate. they’re gonna be busy kissing the ring of the new boss, so they won’t let Obama take away a nomination from him/her/it.

yes this happens literally all the time in DC. Everyone has a side project that their boss knows about but doesnt necessarily support.

It can be part of the record and not considered. For instance, if you went to trial for murder and someone else’s fingerprints were on the gun, but the factfinder concluded that you were the only person who handled the gun, you could say they disregarded it or failed to consider it. You would raise it on appeal as a…