anti-nickname
anti.nickname
anti-nickname

I had a feeling that would be the response at some point. I like blog view because I like to think most of these stories are of "equal weight" until I, the consumer, decide which ones are of most importance to me. I am not trying to sound whiny or anything, but is it really difficult to either have a censored version

I really consider Jezebel and Gawker to be more than just gossip sites, but I could easily look at a gossip site without getting into the same kind of trouble that I would get into while looking at NSFW images. Everyone needs a break, man—if people want to spend it on "celebrity gossip" sites, I don't really see the

Jenna, the issue isn't with the individual post—the issue is with the fact that going to blog.jezebel.com results in having the NSFW image appear on the screen (and it's a large image), thus making it pretty much impossible for someone to avoid the NSFW content while looking at the the website in blog mode, at least.

I agree. A million times over. Cosette can have him.

This. This is exactly right. I highly doubt that there was no way to add another number to the musical until the movie came along. Regardless of the song's relevance, I think that having a Best Original Song contender is the main reason why this occurred.

Seriously.

Ah. I misunderstood your initial comment, then. It seemed like you were saying that consent for sex was given because pants were off. My apologies!

That said, I would actually find it INSANELY hot for a guy to just simply ask, "Is this cool? Are you alright with this?". Not just because it means that he takes consent seriously, but it shows that he gives a shit about your experience with him. That's hot.

I like!

I have been in situations where my pants have come off but I don't want to have sex. Other things can occur that are not sex but would also potentially involve pants coming off. Consenting to one sexual act does not mean consent to all sexual acts, just like consenting to vaginal penetration does not mean consenting

Talking vaginas make me think of "Teeth." I know it's not the same thing, but seriously, talking vagina = vagina with mouth/mouth in vagina = TEETH.

It *is* possible to try to point something out but not be arguing against your main point. I'm simply responding to the implication that they suddenly conjured up this story to cover for the fact that they named the cat "Tard" simply because they now have major media coverage. The word "backpedaling" implies that. All

I included the fact that they said the whole thing with the cat took off at the end of September on Reddit. I believe the site says September 22. So, September 22 to October 8 (the date of the post I linked to, I think?) is not a lot of time, though I suppose if we look at the Internet in "dog years" then yes, that's

I included the fact that they said the whole thing with the cat took off at the end of September. I believe the site says September 22. September 22 to October 8 (the date of the post I linked to, I think?) is not a lot of time.

I posted pretty much the same thing in reply to someone else, but I'm posting it to you, too (sorry for the repetition, but I'm still not used to how comments are seen on this site):

Looking at the posts made about the cat on the Grumpy Cat page, it looks like "tardar sauce" is a tag that was used in a number of posts going back to the beginning of October, and I think the site says that the picture of the cat took off at the end of September. So, I don't think it's backpeddaling. I mean, it could

I absolutely adore SN, but I have to agree with the others who responded and say that I don't think such things are actually established on the show, even through inference. I think it's left open for us to interpret the torture as including rape, and I actually have thought about Dean's experience both ways, but I

This times a million. *THANK YOU*

Yeah I definitely saw it as horrifying and violent. I was freaking out about whether or not they were going to rape her, for sure, and I didn't see anything that took away from it being terrifying. I'm confused as to why this person feels it was "eroticized." I suppose I should go read that review.

Yes, I am very nervous about Anne Hathaway as Fantine. I'm also nervous about Hugh Jackman as Jean Valjean. They both strike my as too glossy for the roles, and as much as I love Hugh Jackman, I'm just not sure about this choice. Also, I am really not looking forward to Russel Crowe being part of this project, so I'm