You have zero clue about Freud. I'll walk you through it.

Right. If you're not a fan you're a troll.

It's not easy… being myopic.

I'm not opposed to seeing older people. I'm opposed to the sheer number of them. And the dead characters. And the offscreen never to be seen characters. It's a bit much.

Thank you for a reasoned response. Understand that if you boil down what I said it's oversimplied as: this new Peaks is too slow, woman unfriendly, geriatric, backwards glancing, and kind of pretentious to be terribly compelling Peaks but just okay Peaks.

Fans can handle a contrary opinion. Fanboys can't.

The three CWs I watch have cast members of all ages. Try to know what you're talking about.

Why are you speaking on behalf of all people who haven't seen THE PRISONER?

I found it kind of interesting actually. That our folly is to blame. Great idea within leaden pacing.

Newsflash: loving season one, liking season two, being disappointed by season three isn't a self love fest. It's just commenting.

Zippy — I'm asking for some balance. There are new actors that we don't get to see. Because Lynch would rather show some jackass (someone like you) sweeping.

I have no problem with old folks. I'm one of them. My problem is this show used to have a balanced cast. Now it's THE GOLDEN GHOULS.

Go be a Scientologist. This is a comment field not the Lynch Fellatio Club

Try THE PRISONER. Try TWIN PEAKS TOS.

At this point you have to get used to a few things —

I can never get over the arrogance we had as a people trying out a nuke. I mean sure it probably wouldn't erase existence as we knew it.

There is a God

Keep stroking your log. Or what women call French Fry.

I gave you a real answer, Zippy.

I can't believe your spinal column is connecting much of anything.