CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

In fairness it was not just one thing...You make it seem like he had one drunken incident which resulted in a car crash! He was, more or less, a human trafficker for years and years.

Good read and thank you for the research. (Even without your post, it kinda seemed like a small concession to make for a lot of ground to gain.) Sadly, though, the audience here is interested only in purity.

*sighs* Listen to me closely, everyone. If Democrats were in charge of the Senate, McConnell wouldn’t matter any more than would Sinema or that other one like Sinema. It’s that simple.

*sighs* Listen to me closely, everyone. If Democrats were in charge of the Senate, McConnell wouldn’t matter any more than would Sinema or that other one like Sinema. It’s that simple.

Wow, still talking about this?

Already have. Or has everyone forgotten about Michael Reinoehl already?

*sighs* You’ve been instructed to stop, and you’ve been told why (you’re an idiot, and can’t plausibly hide it).

And this is why we lose. The only thing that’ll fix this is voting for Democrats, but it has to be consistent, uncomplaining, and has to last years or generations.

You’re not supposed to admit that Elvis had a legacy, because The Root doesn’t like him.

It also, you know, looks a fair bit like the comic book version. So you know that might’ve been a slight influence.

The Satanic Temple are great at publicity stunts. They’ve done some good stuff largely by accident. Having said that...At this point anyone who can help, I’m on board with.

I wasn’t kidding. Stop.

So, some sports guy! Question is why you care so much what some sports guy does or does not do to his ex-wife. And the answer, it would appear, is that you’re an idiot who talks in text acronyms.

Oh, he was a football player. Ok, so I was right, this is some sports guy.

*sighs* The point is that both trials were shit, therefore both verdicts were shit too, and no one can know for sure. The fact that more White people agreed with the civil verdict than the criminal verdict doesn’t make it better.

I assume you mean so I can understand your moronic terminology? Nope.

My point is that both trials were shit and, if this were all rational, he couldn’t trust one verdict more than the other. So are you essentially telling me that, to him, this is a civil court version of one of those dumb 1970s “I know he’s guilty, the system failed me...” revenge fantasy movies?

[Been a good run, I guess.]

This is an excellent question.