Not to mention the source of Hillary being dishonest was in fact an opinion piece written in the 1990's by a right wing tool in which everything he stated turned out to be false, but the media keeps it alive:

Thing is, the Clintons have gotten involved repeatedly in things which seem ‘enormously stupid’ under close scrutiny. The key here being the amount of scrutiny they fall under tends to be more extensive than anyone else in either party. But the context of it really is, that most politicians do stupid stuff like that.…

They support single-payer in a vacuum. They don’t support it if it would entail raising taxes, losing their current plan, having to wait longer to get in to see a doctor, etc.—all pretty inextricable parts of single-payer. (This includes Sanders supporters: http://www.vox.com/policy-and-pol…)

Oh, he’d just talk about the revolution. His peers in Congress would HAVE to vote for universal healthcare because otherwise all his supporters will rise up and vote them out of office! (Never mind that he’s counting on the revolution to come from a bunch of people that can’t be bothered to vote in the midterm…

Ugh, I used to love Sanders, but I think he’s being such a shit little white man and saying that Hillary basically has to adopt all of HIS policy platforms before he’ll endorse her. Ummm, bro, Hillary is way more qualified than you are to be President and just because she’s a woman doesn’t mean she can’t have her own…

This is the thing that made me absolutely furious about Sanders. Not that he ran a strong campaign, but that he denigrated the entire democratic party in the process. Not just tired to move the party to the left, which is fine, but try to destroy the party. There is a difference between wanting to evolve and grow the…

Lol, okay. Out of two candidates, he won a near majority!

Clinton has a long history of working for civil rights. If you actually did more than read memes on reddit, you would know what her history was.

Educate yourself on Sanders record, dear:

If Bernie had ACTUALLY wanted DWS out and real structural change, he would have asked quietly that she step down after she secured re-election in November. Publicly demanding her head in the middle of a contentious re-election campaign for her was about punishing her at a time when Bernie was spinning a bit out of…

And let’s just be clear about what her use of “super predator” shows. It shows she was reading commentary from sociologists and trying to understand the point in time at which she was because it is much more difficult to know where things are heading when you are in the moment than it is to understand it with…

But, you are missing the point. Bernie is a white male. Yes, he’s Jewish, and that would be a first and cool and things, but he’s still a white male who has been in politics for years. Further, he ran specifically, via his own words, for the white working class. He said this himself.

You do realize that at the time she used “super predator” it had been used once about a month and a half earlier in an article that referred to white and hispanic youths ALSO as super predators in some situations. It was not a racially tinged word until later. But of course you don’t because you can’t get that history…

No. Being the DNC chair means that he or she is tasked with getting actual Democrats elected by the Democratic Party.

I would also add that Hillary did not only pull the Center Dems. I’m a progressive, and a registered independent, and I only had to glance at Bernie’s website to know he was not the candidate for me. I am not alone in this. I’ve posted it elsewhere on Jez, but this purity test liberal BS coming from the Berniecrats is…

Oh FFS. Sanders was not polling with any kind of real support at the time this stuff was written. It’s not unfair to support a strong front runner to try to make sure a Dem gets the nod. You know what Sanders supporters? HRC was also favored early on in 2007/8. You know what, a black man named Barack Hussein Obama…

The job of POTUS isn’t to “excite” voters. The job of POTUS, and by extension the candidates for POTUS, is to be a competent, thoughtful executive officer who will represent the will of the American people on the intranational and international stages. The idea that candidates have to be “exciting” is juvenile. Trump…

You can vote for whoever you want. As long as you are willing to take responsibility for the way that you vote. You have free will, and you know the alternative in this election.

As long as you understand that if Trump wins you can’t blame it all on her for not “earning” your vote. Actions have consequences.

I’d argue that he’s ossibly more egotistical than Hillary, seeing as she did drop out once she had lost to Obama. And she had just as many followers who supported her. When it’s over, it’s over.