I made it through 3/4 of the first episode before giving up, so... You know... (I’m a huge sucker for space scifi, and this show. Is. Just. Awful.)

I made it through 3/4 of the first episode before finally giving up. It’s bad. Really bad. But since it is a Netflix original, it does not surprise me one bit.

Even on my gaming pc the difference is huge. Went from 2x 7200rpm drives in RAID-0 (blazing fast at the time I built it) to Nvme pci-e drive and levels don’t load anymore. They simply appear. I can’t imagine the difference on a console reading off a DVD to a 5400rpm drive to now using an integrated SSD (or at “worst”…

Even better is someone on Twitter posted a clip of this dumbass dude being interviewed himself and through the entire thing he “um” and “uh” every other word. Sounded just like a 17 year old girl, except nowhere near as intelligent.

If there’s one thing judges hate above all others, it is for an appeals court to strike down his or her ruling. 41 pages were used to make sure any appeal to the next higher court has an even smaller loophole to jump through. Appeals judges could say, “Judge Some Person didn’t do/take into consideration X as per…

I do my part buying legal weed here. Where the fuck is all of that tax money going? Was supposed to supplement the education fund...

The Division isn't an MMO.

Jon didn't even fucking pet him or say goodbye or anything! Wtf?

Dragons are easy to kill since they are blind and cannot see a fleet of warships on the water while scouting from hundreds of feet up. Sigh. Cartoon villain man Euron-ex-machina strikes again.

I believe it is because these are federal charges, which means the US Attorney dropped any other charges if they agreed to plead guilty to this one charge, with specific declarations (they did not attack others in self defense).

“Who the fuck started an interstellar war with the Quagians?”

Can’t forget about the dude named Joe Pesci.

Every politician makes stupid mistakes.

What I feel is missing in all of these arguments about to impeach or not, is the fact that impeachment means Trump is basically on trial in the Senate.

It isn’t meant to remove him from power because the GOP won’t vote against him. It’s meant to publicly, under oath, question him so he will lie or admit he broke the law. It’s for voters, not GOP senators.

She has thought about it. Impeachment means a trial in the senate where Trump will be forced to answer under oath. Imagine him not lying in that situation. Imagine him admitting to breaking the law but saying he is the president and can do anything he wants. Imagine the Twitter meltdowns each night.

Forget trying to convince Republicans in the Senate to vote for impeachment. Think about Trump being forced to testify / be questioned under oath with John Roberts as the presiding judge.

She’s not advocating for impeachment because she believes the Republicans in the Senate will be swayed. She’s advocating for it because Trump will be questioned under oath with CJ John Roberts presiding.

Assange is NOT a journalist.

We’ve had Prime since it was first offered. Got an Alexa as well, even one of their shitty Fire tablets. 3 Kindles (and I have 31 published titles @ Amazon’s book section, which was a huge boon to me being able to retire from tech to write full-time). Subscribe and Save. Music. Video. Loyal customers for many various…