angrydrifter
John Norris (AngryDrifter)
angrydrifter

... that is why they deserve better pay even if the company is destined to fail.

I’m sorry if I wasn’t clear enough making my point. I put out an extreme example. So I’ll try and narrow my explanation for you.

So, don’t cross the picket line. Don’t use a ride share app on Wednesday the 8th. Find another way to get around. Every human deserves a living wage.

I could fix it.

I agree. The easy stuff is hard and the hard stuff is really, really hard.

The joke of a transitionary technology aside (the time period for a “transitionary” fuel source was probably about 100 years ago, if we don’t switch to a zero-emission economy fast we’re pretty much entirely fucked, if we’re not entirely fucked already)

Burning man is headed to Talladega. You heard it here first,

If EV’s are such a good idea let them stand on their own merit. Every subsidized industry gets addicted to the subsidy. Case in point EV’s. Reference, this article.

“The demand for Model 3 is insanely high. The inhibitor is affordability,” he said. “It’s just, like, people literally don’t have the money to buy the car. It’s got nothing to do with desire. They just don’t have enough money in the bank account. If the car can be made more affordable, they will... the demand is

Cary, I believe you responded to the wrong post.

Oh. You win.

We’ve subsidized enough. The EV market needs to stand on it’s own; or not.

No, just that car. That was just an excellent choice.

To that point, there are a number of factors in play here, from a proliferation of large SUVs ...

Well if you’re going to give that credit for miles, then these three have been orbiting the earth (well also the sun) since the 70's.

Now playing

So far, Elon’s track record on full-autonomy predictions are somewhere around zero percent accurate. At some point, though, he’s likely to get this right. Maybe it’ll be this time?

In Australia?  Well then go out with a 1 series M-Ute.

In a discussion on some crime and some victims I interpreted your response as you took an opportunity to mock Texas for not standing up to your social service standards. I apologize for my attribution if that’s not what you did.

Good point.

I pointed out that you mocked Texas and that your point was unrelated to the fact the crime occurred and it impacted people. I argued the point you made.  That’s not building a strawman.