So, you want a page to ask a 14 year old if they are 18/21. Cause that has a GREAT history of preventing underage people from accessing sites they shouldn’t (not to say Kotaku is one of them).

Damn. You managed to sum up an 24ish paragraph article in one comment. Bravo, you.

Damn....well...

right!? God.damn

Alone? AS.SHE.SHOULD.

Great bear comments aside, I know that I, and many others, have said this. Let me say it once again, for good measure:

Nor am I. But given how incredibly recent that WikiLeaks tweet was, I can’t help but think Obama saw it and went, “Oh yeah? Two birds,one stone. Your move Julian.”

Although all you said is crippling and depressingly true, that doesn’t take away from the talent in how you said it. Bravo.

I can’t believe that exchange happened (I mean, I can). Hearing it live, my jaw dropped (nothing new these days). But lets meditate on that exchange for a moment...That.Man.Is.PEOTUS.

Equally insulting to intelligence is Grassley’s response: I couldn’t count all the awards I have gotten. If I had to fill out that questionnaire, it would never get done (paraphrasing). THAT IS NO EXCUSE. It is Sessions duty to fill out that survey to the best of his knowledge and if I had received an award that I…

THANK YOU! That was my first thought.

As a Philadelphian, and an eagles fan, I can appreciate this joke.

I don’t disagree, that’s a valid point. But I believe they are going to withhold info from Trump as long as the can. Even the POTUS can be on a need-to-know basis and If they are looking into Russia’s connections to the hacks, it’s not a stretch to think they are also looking in Trumps connections to Russia.

Is anyone stopping to think about the fact that presenting specific evidence would also be very telling to Russia as to how they got it? And given the bleak future we are looking at, they want to keep the sources of that info secure.

That’s why, if given the option, I go sitting down. Problem solved, no room for error.

Not really. This has quite a bit more “weight” and genuine strategy to it. Whereas I find Ticket to Ride to have a little more of a luck of the draw element. Powergrid is still very approachable though.

The whole point of stating something as a devils advocate is to look at something from a different point of view. Doesn’t mean adopting it. Please read my original statement again.

Do not disagree with you in the slightest. However, devil’s advocate, watching “barely legal” style porn has never made me want to seek out actual child porn, let alone have a desire for sexual relations with a child. Again, not disagreeing. Just throwing something out there.