Trump is also depicted here with a book of Adolf Hitler’s speeches next to him, something Ivana Trump said in 1990 was a real thing—he allegedly liked to read My New Order, chillingly enough
Trump is also depicted here with a book of Adolf Hitler’s speeches next to him, something Ivana Trump said in 1990 was a real thing—he allegedly liked to read My New Order, chillingly enough
You’re entitled to your opinion. My opinion, based off of reading interviews with her, is that her responses to questions are nonsensical.
Even if we dismiss her bizarre wiffle-waffling on vaccines, I have yet to see the woman give a coherent answer to simple questions. She’s obviously a reactionary rather than critical thinker—and deals in non-sequiturs and red herrings.
I sincerely hope this isn’t the case, but you may be correct. This is unfortunate, as she is kind of crazy—and not terribly intelligent. And I say this as someone who is about as ideologically far-left as one could be.
Indeed. And, when people talk about 2000, they focus only on Florida. However, several analyses have Nader sucking away votes in other places, such as New Hampshire, which Bush won (and also would have given Gore enough votes to win even without Florida). Nader also polled so well in standard blue states such as…
1) This Meme is AMAZING
So racism is a nasty side effect of their unyielding love for a laissez faire system and that’s okay because not interfering is really their priority? Or they’re racists using that as a cover-up?
Hey there, I really respect your view point and I just want to clarify my own here. . . which really isn’t a “point of view” so much as a “point of conflict.” Here’s something you said in response to me:
I don’t know. . . . I’m going to reserve judgment. I think your point is totally valid—and I really do think there is a special place in hell for individuals who—when of completely sound mind—help predators find victims. The only reason I am reserving judgment is that it doesn’t seem like this woman was of totally…
Also got scared for her. I’m so impressed w/ her bravery for coming out with this story. Hope our lawyer friends on here can keep us informed.
Was it a good show?
I’m so glad y’all found each other here. I actually mean this 100% seriously. It was neat to see this conversation.
Oh dear god—it’s an actual PATTERN of bad thinking, rather than just random failures of logic.
She has astoundingly bad critical thinking skills. From an interview w/ Salon:
Unfortunately, that’s not the way the cookie is crumbling this year. In 4-way match-ups, Johnson actually appears to be leeching more votes from Clinton than Trump. In better scenarios, he pulls from both equally.
I’m not even going to play that “safe state” game this election. . . . .I don’t want there being even the SMALLEST fraction of a chance that we win the electoral college but lose the popular vote. . . .
Personally, think Stein seems fairly looney tunes. Her responses to the questions in this interview are nonsensical. Even if she could win, I wouldn’t want someone w/ her critical thinking skills as President. For example. . . .
Thanks for this! I have seen a lot of stuff—and I do trust the New York Times. Still can’t figure out why they were locked in. . . . (I saw in Slate that they were—but no reason was given as to why).
I made the mistake of tuning into the press conference. . .and. . .once I was there, I couldn’t stop watching. . . . it was so freaking bizarre. . . .In addition to inviting Russia to spy on us, Trump had A LOT to get off his shoulders. . . .
Wow. I’ve never had an opinion about Kelly Clarkson. But this is awesome.