andygilleand
Andy Gilleand
andygilleand

Theoretically possible, but it caused frame rate issues on PS3 if the game wasn't designed around it. That's because the PS3 needed to take power away from the CPU to encode the video in real time. PS4 has a separate chip dedicated to encoding video, so it doesn't require taking power away from the CPU to do so. Also,

Hmm. The game doesn't say it's 3D compatible though the PS Store says it is.

At the time the boomerang looked like it would have been a better controller, but now the DS4 is clearly superior. I would have liked Sony to have at least released the boomerang as an optional design controller for ps3 though.

I hope there's an option to invert the map touch control, so that it controls more like touchscreen scrolling.

I always avoid reviews unless I'm really not sure about something. If the reviews are positive, you're likely going to have high expectations that are unlikely to be met, and if the reviews are negative, you're going to be looking for every little thing wrong with it. Either way, your experience is going to be worse

I meant you can use PS3 or 360 controllers on the PC version

they haven't gone into detail about the specific next gen graphical and computational upgrades they've included. The other videos were purely about gameplay. This video impressed me a lot.

The controls are the same if you use an xbox or PS3 controller

Any word on whether they updated aspects of the game to match the changes in AC4's engine?

Surprising they aren't releasing this for next gen consoles as well.

Overacting. Everywhere.

Vita can already remote play PS3 over the internet. This isn't a new feature. PS4 just has more remote play compatible titles.

Yes, the Vita can already do this with the PS3, but obviously PS3 has less remote play compatible software.

The same driver needs to cover all three OSs, in order for the system to be able to switch between OSs without delay. The third OS is less visible, but it does need to have a level of hardware control as well, and as such, the driver needs to cover that OS as well as the other two.

If a driver needs to run on windows, it must be at least as complex as a windows driver. Considering it also needs to run on the XBO's two other OSs, it needs to be even more complex. It needs to be a windows+OS2+OS3 driver. Windows drivers alone limit what graphics cards can do. A driver like this will limit it even

You misunderstood me. They still have a driver, it's just a far more minimal type of driver than MS would need. A driver can do a lot more than simply provide the path from the code to the hardware. That's simply its most basic functionality, what the PS4 will need. Windows drivers are much more complicated. Windows

Sony doesn't need a driver in the same way MS does. The XBO uses Windows 8 so it uses the same driver system as windows. PS4 will be using an OS designed specifically for the PS4, so it will only need a minimal driver, and the rest of the programming will likely be done directly to the GPU, bypassing a driver, which

The PS4 camera is capable of being used for dance games, but I don't think any have been announced yet.

It's still nowhere near as powerful as PS4. PS4's GPU was 50% better than the XBO's before the upclock. Now it will be 41% better. Rumor place PS4's CPU as being up to 25% faster than the XBO's as well, and the GDDR5 memory will operate much faster than the XBO's DDR3 (latency doesn't really have much of an effect at

The G stands for Graphics. It makes sense to pronounce it that way.