I get what you’re trying to say.  However, no matter what GB does, players will always want to know “the best weapons” or “the best builds” to use.

You have that backwards. What’s the point of getting new gear when what you have is OP? I’m not saying you don’t want “end game” gear, but what’s fun in having most people working toward the same small handful of cookie cutter gear sets? Nothing wrong with having a larger variety of roughly equal gear that is…

Borderlands 2 would have been a much better game if they’d been more aggressive with nerfing heavy overperforming builds early on in its lifetime.

What’s wrong with you people?  What makes you think they all “suck”?  

So you’re stating, for the record, you have absolutely no idea how the world works?

A bonkers “build” should not begin and end with a single weapon though. That is what was happening...

Nah, it just means people won’t all go for the same OP builds. What you are calling “meh” is otherwise known as balance. What’s the point in having a million guns and skill trees if 90% of the players pursue the same small handful of builds?

That’s my gripe- what do we expect from a sequel? If it’s just a rehash of the last game, I can understand the “more of the same” criticism, but I genuinely think this installment has added new things to the game and altered the formula to be an improvement on the games that came before them.

I’m enjoying Borderlands 3 a whole heck (not part of the heck, the whole heck) of a lot.

I’m enjoying Borderlands 3 a whole heck (not part of the heck, the whole heck) of a lot. Each playable character mixes up the classes (sniper/infiltrator, brawler, soldier, crowd control) presented in the previous games and puts a new spin on the mechanics of the series. As a sequel, I think it’s pretty strong. It’s…

They didn’t spend 500 million on Seinfeld because no one watches it anymore

Have you not been reading this (and other sites) for the past several months? All they can talk about is how big a deal it is that Netflix is losing Friends & The Office - which are probably their two top streamed shows.

Spend all their money on old TV shows that nobody watches anymore?

Well except that Friends and The Office are two of the most streamed shows.  People like background noise, comfort shows they can repeat over and over while they’re doing something else.

Spend all their money on old TV shows that nobody watches anymore?

Yeah, I don’t give a shit about Seinfeld either, but you have to understand you’re objectively wrong about this.

I think I wasn’t clear enough in my last comment, I know Disney now owns Fox and most of its properties (any Marvel fan anticipating the someday X-Men integration definitely knows), only that The Simpsons would be Disney+’s most viewed property like The Office, Friends and now Seinfeld are for Netflix. Not that Disney…

The Office is fine, but everytime I watch it I think to myself “I wish there was a funnier version of this with more likable characters” and then switch to Parks and Recreation.

But Disney doesn’t have to pay anyone for the Simpsons; having Fox’s deep TV library in perpetuity for no licensing fees is a big reason why they paid out the nose for it and precisely why Comcast was bidding against them.

So this is what Netflix is going to do now, instead of creating new shows? Spend all their money on old TV shows that nobody watches anymore?

jesus these are all terrible takes, they’re both great shows