her energy policy is robust enough, if vague, that i could see it happening, yes. its a red state but not big enough to be an issue electorally

1) she has a position on climate change. debates do not represent policy effectively in any way because they are set-up like a reality show reunion episode for ratings lets all just get that through our heads now

the focus groups are still ongoing. the campaign doesn’t know her [public] opinion yet

meanwhile, we revisit the white house in the year 2014

and she won’t say shit for 10 more days so GOOD LUCK

nice

guys just like

fashion industry created fake pockets to make it harder for women to run away

rude last name for a person since we all came out of a woman imo

bless you

read OR write

where the What About No Woman’s Sky and

Man with a Plan:

or spending 25 minutes talking about our strategy to defeat ISIS when they are already so weak that the iraqi army is good enough to go into their main stronghold city

since now we need to frame everything in the context of russia bc we’ve reentered the 1950s:

anyone know hillary’s plan re: extending the residential and commercial solar panel subsidy

this is the real story here folks

resourceful imo

this is very beside the point but