Mmmm, I'll counter that by saying shaming doesn’t work in AMERICA.

What exactly are you defining as a snitch in this case? Clearly the majority of the men getting called out are Not part of peer groups that would call them to task on their shitty and irresponsible behaviour.

“This really does feel like it was written by an out of touch, out of sense, ignorant, and performativly academic gay that caught sight of themselves in a photo and is not trying to play the victim to avoid accountability for their actions.”

This. 

Right? This is an overly-wordy take that boils down to, “don’t take sides, you don’t know the whole story” except.... no, this is a case where you can absolutely take sides and arguably have a moral obligation to do so.

The comment section on the last article on Elliott was a goddamned mess.

I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it's not intentional, but your comment is like the LaCroix version of transphobia.

“...they actually look good and are worth all the cash spent on them...”

Or he could simply pay for local anaesthetic beforehand? 

This.

ITT: people who have never had a tattoo and/or people who have never had one successfully removed.

You can pay an additional fee for local anaesthetic injections at some laser clinics. 

Right, except the overwhelming majority of professional tattoo artists will not accept - or work on - clients that are in any way intoxicated.

Wow, what a problematic, uneducated and biased take.

And according to myself - that’s wildly incorrect.

This is a surprisingly accurate definition. 

Wow. But I'm definitely in agreement. 

Well, in a roundabout way, you kinda got to the essence of the problem.

Oh yeah the separate bath thing is a whole different discussion, oh my god.

Ahhh, my dream was - is - always of living in a modified duplex with my partner, where we each have a half of an identical house, and we have a door that connects our units from the inside.