Do you always deliberately misrepresent others’ points in comments? It seems like you do.

Exactly this.

Do you even hear yourself.

It IS a good idea, and I already happen to not live in the trashfire called the USA, but a progressive socialist EU country where major oil and gas companies see the writing on the wall and are diversifying very fucking quickly because they know their time is limited. 

I have yet to find a socioeconomic class that isn’t traditionally republican that they would ever view as equal.

If you think this ‘morally superior’ hag Fitzenhagen would ever comprehend the differences between types of sex workers,or understand the shades of legality, I’m afraid you’re sorely mistaken.

I wish more voters would look into things like this.

Right? Why would first-hand experience be of any use when developing policy?

Sure, but what about the three morons who couldn't be bothered to even do that bare minimum.

Unbelievable.

The fact that this is verbatim how they spin their bullshit, and that it is embraced by their constituents never fails to blow my mind.

I’ve read your comment history and it’s only slightly this side of trolling, so against my better judgement, I’ll reply one last time.

Even if it is happening - it isn’t - it most certainly is not happening in the very, very, vanishingly narrow timeframe we have to turn this around.

This is perfect.

I love this reply. 

You’re conflating two separate ideas, and contradicting yourself in the process.

I really love the way you reply to the walking nutsack, Max Contrarian.

Actually, yes.

Even if this was not tilting dangerously into tin foil hat territory, explain how the presence of this machine would preclude the brothers from independently stating whether or not they were key players in a hoax, since they are in no way affiliated with the CPD.

If only this case had been handled properly from the beginning.