All the respect for Mr. Smollet

Your illustrious president quite literally just tweeted that facts are lies. That any fact-checking is fake.

What a repugnant person. Using the stolen lives of children to bolster his hateful rhetoric is.. something else.

You’re deliberately missing the point in order to be glib. Let me break it down for you since I guess the article was tl;dr

“Understandably, many sex educators, feminists, and, of course, squirters themselves revolt at this kind of coverage, seeing it as an attempt to minimize, medicalize, or just plain mock women’s sexuality.”

Additionally, they *certainly* would never financially benefit from a particular outcome.

Sorry, no. Can’t have leftist-agenda organizations being impartial, or anything. Equal and balanced representation of all involved parties? Pshaw.

+1 for factual transcription of investigation

I find my investigations go much faster when I already have my preferential outcome in mind.

It’s too late to edit my original comment, but boy, do I still want to go off on this.

Gee, what a surprise.

.......no. God.

I refer to that as The Mitt and honestly, I have only ever encountered women doing it. It is both fascinating and perplexing.

Swing and a miss.

That is absolutely not what the lawsuit is in regards to, but OK.

From a foreign perspective, it often seems like your constitution precipitates more harm than good, and protects some pretty evil behaviour in the name of freedom..

Accurate.

When I lived in Vancouver, Canada they were implementing a transit-specific police force. Granted, transit infractions and transit crime in that city compared to say, New York were negligible. 

Welcome to privatized mass transit in North America..

I mean, you're certainly not wrong but that could be said about every movie made since circa 2000