Nah, milk is nasty. I drank a lot of it as a kid and today the thought of drinking it straight makes me nauseous. It’s fine as an ingredient in moderation.

It takes a pandemic for Republicans to care about education

I would not actually buy it but I had a visceral NP reaction between the yellow and those wheels.  Logical?  Surely not.  If it was silver or maroon I would not care about this vehicle but that yellow....it gives me the fizz

If they make the 6.4 wrangler it will be the most expensive wrangler ever made by I’m guessing at least $20k. If it’s not that much more expensive I expect a lot of broken drivetrains because they weren’t beefed up enough. That concept not only had a 6.4L in it but the half doors are new, the windowless hard top is…

The engines they’re putting in these are pretty well sorted out by now, of all the things that may go wrong I see those being the least probable. Unless Ford puts the wrong head gaskets on the 2.3s, which is not unprecedented

Looks like a monster sticking its tongue out

PLEASE COME BACK WE NEED A BREAK FROM SHILLING

I’ve driven a turbocharged car for 9 years. Replacement turbos are not cheap, and are not a simple thing to swap.

No such thing as an electric engine

heat soak in the engine bay from the turbo, manifold, and intercooler make the engine bay hotter.

All straight piped engines sound like ass. Most V6s sound like ass regardless.  Proper mufflers are rarely used - it’s either OEM (good) or none (very bad)

You missed the joke, but I agree in general.  Of course around me most V8s are amplified through straight pipes and those sound awful too, but at deafening volume.  

I said in another post that if I could have the 2.7TT in my gladiator I would take it. The 3.6 is fine, but unremarkable.

I said in another post that if I could have the 2.7TT in my gladiator I would take it. The 3.6 is fine, but unremarkable.

I believe their base engine is a 3.3L NA (maybe 3.5) in the F150, and they still have (or had) a V6 NA in the mustang.  So they so have one but in terms of specs it would have to become the default base engine IMO.  Kind of like the Wrangler base engine is the 3.6 with optional 2.0t and 3.0td engines

Are you really asking if 10% of a $50k vehicle is meaningful value?

Fewer moving parts but more complex systems.

In the US?

I specifically said “flagship offroader”, which has always been the CJ/Wrangler.  Argue for the GC all you want but basically everyone will associate “Jeep” with the basic shape and look of the Wrangler

BUT THEY  JUST DON’T SOUND RIGHT