+1 Maxis

To keep in heat. You don't want heat soaking through the header walls; you want it all going into the turbo or out of the end of the tailpipe.

Ha!

How can you say that a company which is putting a rock-solid, torque-vectoring AWD system in a $35k compact SUV lacks innovation or isn't, "trying new things?" Acura focuses on useful features that effect real-world drivability and, by the looks of their 2013 sales, they're doing just fine. I thought Jalopnik admired…

"Animals (except assistive animals)"

[dying]

How do you deal with eating fried chicken or a taco, exam gloves?

+1

So good, +1

Ha!

+1

If you read the updated article, her insurance company is in negotiations with Enterprise. Clearly they're going to come to an agreement so it doesn't have to go to court but you can be sure that Enterprise isn't going to recoup the full value of the car and it will be because of their drop-off policy. But I guess I…

"If it is common sense or not is not in question, it is in the contract which both parties signed"

Exactly, In this case, it's unreasonable to expect the renter to be able to fulfill their end of the agreement when following the rental car company's procedures.

It wouldn't hold up in court.

Sorry, maybe that distracted you too much.

As I said, you can write that in the agreement but if you allow the customer to leave the car in your lot and put the keys in your drop box then you can't claim that the customer was in possession of the car when the theft occurred. That's what they would have to prove in court or, in this case, arbitration with a…

That wouldn't hold up in court. Their drop-off procedure is in conflict with that portion of the agreement. You can't have someone agree to something and then make it impossible for them to follow-through. As I was saying to another commenter, you can put whatever you want in the agreement but that doesn't mean that…

See the update, if the agreement was air tight then they wouldn't have backed off: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/no…