And as expected, the woman gets less than half the sentence of the man. Because woman.

At like 10% of actual speed.

No one’s advocating that someone be beaten for their beliefs, just that if someone beat the shit out of a Nazi we’re not going weep for him.

Morever, people like Richard Spencer, in the meantime, want people to believe that it’s white folks who are under attack from liberal hypocrites. And punching Spencer on the street only serves to validate that mindset.

Also keep in mind that Spencer isn’t just puttering around a grocery store mumbling about white supremacy. He wants ethnic cleansing. That is a thing he is working to accomplish.

There is no room for hate in society. Hate must be abolished through any means necessary.

Well if they start rounding up people again, yes, it’ll come to that. Giving Richard Spencer a bop on the head for advocating “peaceful ethnic cleansing” isn’t close to that.

We certainly stand to gain from studying Americans who downplayed Hitler and businesses who pledged to do business with him.

Our grandparents certainly were.

As for the idea of Hitler, I find it grotesque, and I find anyone championing it grotesque. But that doesn’t mean the ideal way to fight back is with hate and violence.

Yep. And the part where he says “...there’s no room for you in a society I want to build” is particularly chilling, because if that’s true, then punching alone is insufficient for the job. If a person really believes that those with unacceptable views cannot be allowed to take part in society, he or she needs to be…

Yeah, except in 2017's reality, if you don’t punch the “Nazi,” you’re not getting shot at by them. The vilest attitude in the entire exchange is the one that implies you get to do whatever you want to someone else so long as you dump them in the right category.

I think wanting to know whether a person making an off-color joke is an actual racist, sexist, homophobe, or what have you before laughing with them is a pretty reasonable thing.

I’m not saying they are going to succeed. They will fail. I’m just thinking how much it sucks as a consumer. I’d rather those companies be making their own IPs and being creative instead of chasing the next Overwatch.

WoW wasnt the first of its genre to sweep the awards so I’m not picking up on the comparison.

Nope, look at my post history and you’ll see a bunch of different points. They’ve all been made in other places too, so I assume you just don’t care.

We know thats not how AAA game companies work. If anything we are going to see a rampant amount of Overwatch clones. Every AAA company is going to want a team based shooter.

Its really going to make that clear that that is a more viable option for companies when it comes to AAA games.

I feel like you’re making a straw man when you say liberals don’t like them. Especially Silverman.

And who says they’re not?