Twitter would be a waste of Spree’s time anyway. 825 followers wouldn’t give him nearly enough eggs to feed his family.

This joke is funny because once Spreewell choked his coach.

Same guy DMed me, I told him to choke on it.

This video is misleading. They weren’t reacting to the dunk, a guy in the corner just flipped a water bottle.

First the Rosetta stone, now this video. The hieroglyphs are starting to make more sense. All the people and animals are focused on the weeping eye above a goal missing most of it’s netting.

So we are offended at mormon jokes now?

[Watches all that gold change hands in D.C.]

If he wasn't a Mormon he probably would have had some fun with her rack later on

No - writing down a license plate number is not illegal. Additionally, the First Amendment does give people the right to post photos of other people online (though there are some restrictions that apply). You could take a series of photos (or a video) of a person exiting their car - with the license plate visible and…

I picture old timey tonic sales men. Step right up get your abortions here! One day only for the low cost of 6.99 a cure for all that ails you!

Race relations in Philly haven't been this tense since the last time Riley Cooper went to a concert.

Soul Woman: The Rachel Dolezal Story

We agree on the Quiverfull people being scary, and I say that as someone who has family (multiple cousins, nieces, nephews) who are members.

Yes. The correct alternative would be to stay away from the gynecologist because nobody should be touching your vagina except your husband.

“The 1st Amendment grants you the right to speak freely without prosecution.” Yes, that’s right. And what happens if you violate this law? You’re prosecuted. These laws might be constitutional as a reasonable time/place/manner restriction, but to act like there is no legitimate First Amendment issue raised by banning…

When the government says you can’t speak here or can’t speak in this way, that’s *potentially* a problem. For example, similar tactics have been employed against unions.

Not really. Harassment laws aren’t actually in the constitution anywhere. And arguably as long as they aren’t attacking (which chuck pamphlets at could easily be argued with) or physically preventing people from accessing the centers they aren’t actually interfering with the right to have an abortion.

What? My therapist screams at me and calls me a slut. Is that not the right way to counsel patients?

so glad you’ve migrated to over here. many happy returns you beautiful bastard.

I am OK with it as long as this man is allowed to rub up against the pamphleteers while they harass the pregnant women ....