He got convicted of “abuse of office” for wiretapping police and journalists.

Except that he actually is a fool, an obsessive, and a basket case.

Yup. And these people are sitting on juries and voting in elections. Scary stuff.

There weren’t any cartwheels. That was one of the many stories fabricated by the police. She did some yoga stretches after a few hours.

They are all through he comments — I ahve no patience with them. They remind me of Trum or anti-vaxxers -- just keep repeating lies and made up “facts” no matter what evidence is shown that you are wrong and an idiot.

I grew up in Alabama and went to college in South Carolina and to this day, the most racist place I’ve ever been to is Italy.

There was a HUGE amount of physical evidence against Guide. Including, his handprint on the pillow next to the victim in the victim’s blood. His skin cells under her nails and in her vagina. His skin cells and hair all over the murder scene.

Ah, earthquake shade, I hope I have that right. I just posted about that.It was sober turned on appeal but it is just insane that the scientists were prosecuted for manslaughter(!!!!!)  

...yes.

You might want to sit down for a while and read this. The Knox case was not Mignini’s first time at the Satanic cult rodeo.

here ya go: http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/the-neverending-nightmare-of-amanda-knox-20110627

You’re only thinking that because she’s so closely associated with the case. Your mind is tricking you. There is zero physical evidence linking her to the murder.

Facts. People just don’t like them if they don’t fit their pre-conceived narravite. Her DNA was not on the knife.

It’s basically the strategy for the Republican Party. Come out with the headline, repeat it over and over, and don’t give a shit when proven wrong. People don’t even notice.

If you publicly state that you think, even partially, that “at the very least [someone] was privy to some kind of pertinent knowledge [of a murder]”, you should be able to say why you think that. If you can’t suggest even one possible reason for thinking someone may have been partially responsible for a murder, it…

I am in awe of the people who still think she did it. The way people can grab on to the first thing they hear and believe it in spite of overwhelming evidence is so common it is scary.

You won’t like him anymore after watching the documentary, I can tell you that much.

A huge part of me wants to believe she had zero to do with that poor woman’s murder. Another part of me thinks, at the very least, she was privy to some kind of pertinent knowledge.

I’m surprised they didn’t at least try to jail her for not predicting the murder of her roommate. Since the Italians have no problem jailing people for not seeing the future.

She lost her entire youth to this bullshit. The Italian government is bankrupt. They can’t even provide her with money.