Jalopnik will be like:

No matter how small and cheap this is, Internet Small Truck Guy won’t buy it because its not small or cheap enough. I can see the excuses now:

This! I’d have driven it home, parked it and waited for the dealership to call me when it was “ready”.

I mean, the schlub at the bottom used her truck for a Lowe’s run. He deserved to be fired.

You can get retroreflective clear coats which you could lay over the top of the black stripes - just spray it last when everything is masked:

You could do a restrained, tasteful version with Lumilor paint

Some people just want to argue for the sake of hearing themselves.

I’m finding it hard to decide whether I’d rather drive this or the Chrysler turbine car of the same era. I think I’d go with the turbine car, simply because its refills were not somewhat hazardous. The van is still cool, though.

Some may call it “bumping”, some call it “launching them 15 feet into the air.”

So beautiful.  The grille is indeed larger than I would like.  Everything else is perfect.

CCherokee’s, the XJ, are unibody...

Shout out to the Boss 302 Mustang having it back in 1969!

Something something large infotainment screen yell at cloud get off my lawn old person dot gif.

Jalopnik: “There are too many screens!”

Also Jalopnik: “There are too many buttons!”

Also also Jalopnik: “This car isn’t competitive because it lacks such and such features.”

No. Bad data being sent from malfunctioning sensors causing the anti-stall system to force the nose of the plane downward uncontrollably is the problem. Actually, I should back up further. Redesigning a redesign of a redesign of a different aircraft is really the problem. Boeing should have stopped with the 2nd…

Problem too though is that the Z - even if you like it - looks it’s age. It’s heavy - bulbous - even the 911 looks sleeker and more purposeful. I still don’t understand why even though they totally revamped it in this generation it really looks like a facelift 350z. Nissan looks and feels like it really doesn’t care.…

Giving credit where it’s due, that twin-turbo 400 horsepower V6 in the Q50/Q60 is very good. It’s the best thing about those cars. And a real shame it hasn’t been used in other applications, like a new Z.

And could you put “top quality” in bold?  You can’t?  OK, whatever.

Pepsi has a lot of ground to make up if they want to compete against the industry standard in this space: Shiz!