I’m being a dick to you because you are being obtuse. You saying “I wouldn’t even notice if they removed something over a year old” is both obnoxious and silly. Especially because, hey, get this, they are removing stuff less than a year old. Hey, that Willow show? The last episode aired in January 2023. That was five…

Rarely, I will watch something older —and almost always something I have not watched.

So you never watch old movies? You never go back to see any classic films or TV shows? MASH? Taxi? The Mary Tyler Moore Show? Fuck it, Lost? The Office? Friends?

I mean, he brought back the Master, so he’s not against a singular Time Lord returning.

Netflix can put out The Gray Man 2, 3, 4, and 5 and hold the line for a while.

the fact that I think a video game movie making a billion dollars isn’t the end of the world makes me insane? Okay, thanks, boomer.

The general consensus of movie critics and writers of articles like this is that the Mario movie is obviously terrible,

Which means we may be in horrible, terrifying reach of a world in which The Super Mario Bros. Movie makes more than a billion dollars, and, thus, ushers in a cinematic hell on earth the likes of which humanity has only rarely had to contemplate.

Giving crazy ideas a public forum is a good way to get them more followers, not less.

Ah yes. “I don’t like idiots” is such a bad stance for me to have. Bad me, bad.

So now the camps we can put people in are: ‘Progressives, Nazis, or idiots.’

And that’s not a pie-in-the-sky dream, that’s what happened last November.

But imagine that, say, a suburban soccer mom or working-class immigrant who doesn’t pay much attention to politics saw that Stewart clip. Do you think they’d come away from it with a better opinion of Dahm and his politics just because Stewart deigned to talk to him?

It’s impossible to you that someone might, say, have a general tendency towards supporting gun rights BUT be open to persuasion WRT background checks.

Debate with the other side only validates them and makes the “unengaged, unaffiliated middle” see them as a viable option, which they are not.

I get accused of being a ‘centrist’ or a ‘right-wing apologist’ on here a lot, when really the only thing I’m advocating for is for the left to actually engage with what the right is saying - like, the actual points that they’re making - and learn to dismantle those.

There is no “conversation.” People attending aren’t going to be like “Well, that was a nice and healthy debate.” If you let these ideas out into the mainstream, they will infect things and it won’t matter if there are other people saying they are wrong.

The history of the US show. Nothing in this article has to do with the UK version.

Because there was no need to talk about the British version. It’s not relevant to this article.

If a sentence says “The show had an original run starting in 1998" and Colin Mochrie refers to being on the show in 1991, then the article is, by virtue of you knowing how to read, about the US version.