Quite a lot of cars in the list do not deserve to be in it.

It looks good.

I like the Brera (and 159). Unfortunately it (they) were marred by front wheel drive proportions.

Not yet. But we are getting closer.

Not in Europe.

Good to know. Thanks for the info!

You have got to be ultra-precise with those power levels to achieve anything approaching smooth progress if you go briskly.

5.2-litre V10 -> Audi engine? The first step in the takeover or a byproduct of the failed negotations?

In that list there are some cars which aren’t strictly named after winds…

The more I look at the latest Rangey the more I convinced it doesn’t feel like a proper Range Rover. It looks too clean, too asphaltic and a bit clinical and bauhausish.

Being from Spain, in pretty much any F1-related talk he comes up. His die-hard fanatics are often annoying, spearheaded by the commentators of F1 races in Spain.

Not only winds have names, but they have named cars as well, much before this (even this name itself).

More than a bigger fuel tank the analogy wouldn’t be with max fuel flow? In which case it can indeed impact performance.

Apparently it drives well because we drive to close to the edge of the road?

What a shame being able to include Fiat correctly in that statement. 😞

And even harder to sell 20,000 for 40 grand.

That gearbox is as daft as it is magnificent.

The EV6 is rear wheel drive as standard, isn’t it? That is one of the good things about EV, they are bringing back rear wheel drive as a mainstream solution.

Good modern design:

I also usually see electric cars driving slowly (70-75mph), so what is the point of having a bazillion horspowers if you are just going to drive at the speed limit?