I roll up my windows.

Strategy mistakes have also undermined Vettel’s chances for the last few races. Meanwhile Mercedes has been flawless.

I agree with you in the first case. Not so sure in the second; Vettel had at least 3/4 of the car alongside Verstappen.

This is the race where (very probably) Vettel lost the title. The move was probably Verstappen’s fault (who managed to force both Ferraris off the track in the race) but Vettel was possibly a little bit too brave. There was talk of Raikkonen ignoring the team orders at the end; wouldn’t probably have made much of a…

North-eastern Spaniard here.

It is actually based on a Fiesta, so by pricing it like a Focus, Ford actually makes more money on these.

That is because the Ecosport is based on the Fiesta, not the Focus. That is why it is so “small”.

I am more surprised on the massive engine in this Fiesta on stilts.

Or a southern european.

I pushed your buttons? Sorry a differing opinion angers you.

This is mental indeed.

“Valtteri please, let Lewis by”, I don’t see any confusion.

Turbos often mute engines.

Mercedes gets media exposure and acknowledgement.

Because the team wants to secure both championships.

I don’t want to say explicitly that fans are wrong, but if wheel to wheel racing and overtakes are the only things that a fan care about F1 is not the series they should be watching. There other better motorsports for that. 

Oh and by the way... in the early days of the sport when communications and telemetry were almost non-existent there was the rule that if lead driver retired the team could pull a team mate into the pits and the car returned to the track with the lead driver in it.

Verstappen charge through the field was great and Hamilton’s move on Vettel quite excellent too.

Counterpoint: all those said fans should understand how motorsport works.

It is true. But comparing with Ricciardo he had one hell of a drive.