@rebeldevil: +1000
@rebeldevil: +1000
@Quattro-luvr: I would love too, but I don't see it happening anytime soon.
@Beavertank: I would like to complain about both, but as the issue of the batteries had already been brought up in the comments, I didn't want too. But coal fired plants are dirtier because regardless of how much more efficient it is to generate electricity in one large plant, they lose a large majority of that energy…
@buckleyneko: Aren't they generously subsidizing these things? Beyond the point of profit?
The problem is,
This reminds me of this awesome TED talk I saw a while ago
This kind of decentralization is absolutely critical for the internet to survive into the future, as it preserves the freedoms of the internet, along with preventing someone or some nation from single handedly exerting control over the internet, something that is against the very nature of the internet itself.
C'mon....
@MrFluffyThing: Yea sorry,
@mullingitover: Cablevision did something like that when they fought with news corp.
@ripfire: Yeah, cablevison knows how to tell customers who is the evil one.
@GizmoTron9000VowsToEarnBackHis...: I think it does,
Gimme a second while I scrape my mind off the walls...
@schunniky: Its great I know,
@nightrue: paq8o10t is a really obscure, but high ratio algorithm that was designed as a branch of the paq series of compression algorithms. It is the most effective for general compression of the bunch but is very slow.
@schunniky: paq8o10t is a really obscure, but high ratio algorithm that was designed as a branch of the paq series of compression algorithms. It is the most effective for general compression of the bunch but is very slow.
The problem with algorithms like this, is they end up with really awesome, but slow and clunky CLI only applications like paq8o10t that are very obscure with no practical purpose.
@DoubtedBeef: People who write compression algorithms should be classified as a new species.