But emissions are the result of burning fuel. It stands to reason that if the fuel economy tests don't represent real-world efficiency, the emissions tests don't represent real-world emissions either, considering that the car burns more fuel on the road than it does in a lab under controlled conditions.

Ok, serious question/tin foil hat rant :

Only put Turbos on the Turbo, give the rest Superchargers. It's the only way.

U win Sir

Absolutely gorgeous.

My MR2 with a built-in Keurig so I can brew fresh coffee while I'm stuck in traffic.

I always found my old Chevy Volt very zen-like when commuting in traffic and I kinda miss it in that regard.

Westy Vanagon, you can just turn around and cook some food while you wait for the traffic to move.

Tesla model S provides the best in-car entertainment without burning fuel.

Things he's not too keen on include four-cylinder M engines and M cars built from on the new front-wheel drive UKL platform, but the latter would be possible "if we can make it sharp enough."

Saw this and it seemed fitting...

Ohh, how wrong you are.

Been there brotha. I tried for two years with my girl, but she always claimed the ass is sin.

2040 is a stretch goal, not a hard date. Late 2044/early 2045 is more likely.

If he delivers on this shit, my next car should be perfectly timed to be a model 3. Right now with falling gas prices there has been a lot of anti tesla sentiment. My desire for a car with full torque from zero RPM and less mechanical parts splashed with a dose of fun hasn't abated one bit. I'm willing to admit that I…

Ok, this is rad.

Some of us know the Mega Track, of which less than 10 were built, but the frenchies at Mega didn't stop there. They built an even rarer car, the Monte Carlo:

MEGA TRACK!

Man, what a beaultiful car. Want.

1966 Ferrari 365p Berlinetta "Tre Posti"