I was looking into Section 42 housing yesterday. To qualify for a certain unit as a certain price, a single person can make no more than ...

Dictator taste is nothing if not consistent. It’s actually kind of amazing. Like, is there a gene that determines you will have a gold-toilet portrait-with-Jesus orientation?

My hideous (inside and out) sister in law claimed her Republican values led her to decide that, and I quote, she “did not want to have to pay taxes in order to send someone who works at MacDonald’s to get a college education.” I almost fell on the floor, being that there is so much wrong in that statement I don’t even…

I suppose it’s too much to hope that this dining set was made in the US by union labor from sustainable wood.

You can’t criticize the man’s taste, tho. I mean, that one Jesus painting? Iconic.

I have family that works in the federal government. They, and their colleagues, apparently understand that they’re public servants and stewards of the taxpayers money and, at least to me, conduct themselves accordingly. This administration on the other hand seems to solely comprised of people looking to milk…

The furniture purchases initially came to light after career staffer Helen Foster filed a complaint alleging that she’d been demoted after rebuffing Candy Carson’s demand that over $5,000 be spent on redecoration, claiming she was told that “$5,000 will not even buy a decent chair.”

What are these before and after pictures about? He just got redder and hairier.

Warning to adults everywhere. These kids are really smart and really good at the social media, stop screwing with them.

As a lawyer, I think you might be on stronger ground challenging this based on Obergfell, since parenthood is as much a fundamental right as marriage. Pretty much all the same rationales enumerated in Obergfell ought to apply here. Of course, adoption is a bit different from marriage in that there is a state interest…

Hahaha, like the faith based adoption agencies were getting kids out of the foster system anyways.

Question! PAGING LAWYER JEZZIES

I remember watching a show where a woman against LGBTQ couples adopting met two people who aged out the foster system. She asked them what they thought about being adopted by a LGBTQ couple. Both of them basically said they would have had no problem with it. They wanted to be adopted. It blow her mind to hear them say…

“Just because you are a faith-based organization, doesn’t mean you have to check your faith at the door and cannot participate in government programs,” Ligon said.

The fact that they can decide not to work with anyone for ‘faith-based reasons’ is such a slippery slope? What is to stop a particularly racist clerk from deciding not to work with a couple that doesn’t fit their racist views.

“Faith-based” makes me want to scratch my eyes out. These fucking hooligans. They’re a disgrace.

“To hell with those kids, they don’t need homes.”

Based on the many home accidents she’s self reported on twitter, her home schooled kids are probably less safe, especially since there’s probably copious amounts of firearms in her home.

My favorite part of her story is how desperate she was to be an actress and had to settle for acting like a piece of shit in public for gun manufacturers.

I want these students to succeed in making this happen! Go fight hard all of you! Win this for the rest of America which desperately wants gun control but cannot get politicians to listen to our voices.