It’s never a good look when the only saving grace of an action is that it’s not illegal, especially in a public relation letter....

“Let them eat cake” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let_them_eat_cake) is much less a problem if you sell the ingredients and recipe to the masses, thus making a profit on every step of the way.

Quite certain that same community will exhaustively research the other transformations as well.

Herding cats seems much easier in comparison.

If it is an expanded Ogre Battle with unique mechanics and the gorgeous Vanillaware style, it will be a must buy from me.

That is exactly why I judge games on a game-by-game basis, after it’s been released.

Someone probably has to point out to execs that gene splicing is an incredibly dangerous and precise operation that has a very low chance of success unless you change only minute things over long period of time for a very high investment.

Probably not Mario Party 4 though...

I’m currently knee-deep into TotK, but once I complete it(probably in a hundred hours more), it’s Pikmin and Super Mario Wonder time.

In a purely legal standpoint: indeed, both judgements are distinct.

It was delisted after the dev company went belly-up and therefore only Steam was liable for the refund mechanism. I’m not even sure the refund cost of these first 100k copies had even TIME to register and being sent to the (now defunct) dev.

Probably Steam (Valve) itself: it probably LOST money because of the incredible refund rate and liquidation tactic used by the dev being shut down and probably placed under bankruptcy laws.

Probably not. But remember, strawmanning media is the go-to solution for any gamer opinion these days.

That decision is way worse for Google as it would allows ANYBODY, not just Epic Games, to be allowed to use their own payment systems and application installers (I.E. “Game stores”). Like Microsoft, as stated in the articles.

In my headcanon, there is a Hyrule timeline with all three wielders of the triforce working together to twarth a greater evil. All three with different mechanics, stories and playable path.

This reeks of the “three steps backwards, two steps forward” strategy:
1- Implement a feature that you know will cause backlash among target demographic of buyers.
2- Let the backlash explodes.
3- Offer a “solution” that rollbacks parts of the “problem”, while looking humbled doing so.
4- Let time pass so that people…

Likely counter -arguments (not saying I agree on all of those):
- Consoles markets are analogous to PC and mobile: they are, in of themselves, a microcosm in which you can have a monopoly. It is unreasonable to expect every potential customer can, and would, buy a new console/Pc/phone to be able to purchase a similar…

Ho, there is plenty of those (guns in game). The article says that the Z rating is for gameplay allowing the killing of civilian targets, which is probably more sensible.

As for actual gun control, yeah, Japan is VERY sctrict about those. To the point that criminals would rather be caught with blades rather than guns.…

Gratuitous french is the best french (kiss is even better).

I wonder by which metric Destiny would be titled “king” of. I’m pretty sure that if we include portable gaming, it’s nowhere near the top of anything.