I hope you get what you want. Nintendo is famous for giving things to people they didn’t known they wanted.

Hum, he actually disproved your point. Yours is just a piss-poor straw man and moving the goalpost fallacy.

I don’t buy that narrative (bad pun intended).

I can only picture your delivery guy as some kind of sarafi-hardened explorer with no fear who eats cannibals and angry wildlife for lunch.
Bad sterotypes of the “dark” africa, but can’t help to picture it any other way....

What about the very first Streisand incident? According to Wikipedia they sued a photographer to remove a picture of her primary residence (which article was not even about them, but coastal erosion). When news of the lawsuit emerged, only then was the public aware of it, that Streisand had a literal castle as a…

That’s one way to look at it. The S.E took effect halfway through the story.

That’s not what the “Steisand effect” is. This effect is when the owner of something wishes it to remain hidden or low key (even outright out of public knowledge), and by trying to hide it, blows the lid open for everyone to know about it by creating a media firestorm. Basically, secrecy backfiring.

That’s the real challenges that can make or break a couple!

I have seen that question being asked in nearly EVERY single academia setting, in extremely progressive environments: it’s a basic premise for discussion. That subject matter is called “reappropriation” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reappropriation). Shame nobody in that Reddit thread (Jobst included) bothered…

So, besides a shady screen cap of a single Discord handle, no other recorded history, no corroboration on any other website and no further explanation? Just a random Kotaku viewer having doubts and we should take his word for it?

So, if I follow your “logic”, every single toymaker (or any maker of anything not entirely digital) is guilty in a conspiracy to raise prices of every single item produced, ever, if they don’t maintain production for eternity.

It’s a bit like a catch 22. She’d like having a bit less exposure and more control over how she wants to be perceived, but at the same time she’s one of the highest star in her sports (both as a popular icon AND player), which does bring benefits (she’s rich because of it; make no mistake about what she’s gaining…

I guess her agent went a bit for the sensationalist angle (a bit of self-victimization here) after her emotional spill. It’s kinda her angle lately (being a critic of the media and the tennis organisation forcing interview via contracts) for the “scene”.

So, not a single mention of Karl, no link anywhere else, only a user handle in a single picture (wow, what incredible proof.....), no internet article can be found anywhere, no interview and nothing but slander on his name.

Sometimes the obvious solution is so obvious that nobody tried it.

That’s the weakest case by logical fallacy (guilt by asociation) I’ve seen in a while. That’s all you got on the guy?

The very fact that a “competition” to see who would hold a STAGGERING 32 WR at the same time in a extremely competitive space (of more than two players) at the same time is kinda the main problem here.

“To the privilegied, equality sounds like oppression”.

I’m going to file this post in the same bin of “Nintendo is doomed and does not know what’s it’s doing”.

Skullomania is owned as a character for Arika. There is a recent game with him: