Money is the number one reason why this Giants meeting feels like a sham. This franchise is currently committed to several years’ worth of expensive contracts for players over 30 who range from respectable to washed.

I'm glad we can go back to talking about how problematic nancy can be without it being sexist.  Shes stil the mot qualified, but I'm looking forward to her qualified replacement.

I this ironic at all. Everyone said that she was overworkin and taking credit fo the work of people under her. Ony jezebel turned it into an anti powerful woman thing.  This is what people were saying all along.

I now realize that you are that tomato guy, and I’m embarassed to have engaged this long. Yougot me.  Take care.

Thank you for writing about this. I feel like its getting lost in everything.

You’re obfuscating, you are trying to ask questions that have no basis in reality. This is classic “do you still beat your wife, Yes or No?” stuff. I’d have to first accept your premise, which I don’t.

I categorically reject the racist classification system. Its not obfuscation, If you believe that these classifications are something to engage and uphold, she upheld them. If you don’t believe in the classification system, its irrelevant.

Given the racist framework of discussing race, she thought she was giving the accurate answer. If you imagine a framework of discussing and talking about race that isn’t as racist, then we veer off into propping up a racist system by legitimizing aspects of it. I don’t see the point in that.

incorrect. Latinx is the proper ungendered English term. 

Also, maybe never go from kissing to requesting a blow job. If a woman wants to do that, she’ll make that move. Otherwise, you’re shortcircuiting a mutual sensual experience so that you can bust a nut as soon as possible.

I think you are thinking more of middle school bio with basic 2x2 punnet squares. At the highschool level I think for eye color they do 8x8 and for hair 16x16.

Race is a white supremacist, racist, colonialist construction. To the extent that she was engaging in that framework she did it in the only way that is possible. The pushback to how that construct is applied is a seperate matter.

But that is the argument being made.  What is your argument?

I don’t understand what you are saying.

If the argument is that she was lying for gain. That argument falls apart.

Not really. A good friend is a highschool biology teacher. Every year she does a genetics lesson, one of the lessons is about genes for eye/hair color. At least once a year and sometimes more, some kid realizes that one of her parents couldn’t possibly be her parent. Every year.

I’m not even talking about BvS the movie. I’m talking about the commercials (featuring what we now know were Bruce’s nightmares). In those commercials superman was revered as a god/king, his mom was telling him that he didn’t owe the earth anything, and he was keeping batman prisoner after saying that he hated how he…

I think this article needs a bit more work. Gillibrand is a Senator. Rand got in trouble for using senate proceedings, under a rule that specified, don’t use senate proceedings. This isn’t even a house proceeding. This is an executive proceeding that uses the house building. Under the current rules, I’m thinking the…

But then it shouldn’t Apply to Gillibrand who is in the Senate.  I think this article needs a little more work.

Gillibrand is not a part of the house.  How does this apply?