What a weird Lambo.

It’s a David Tracy thing, you wouldn’t understand....

How’d you like the ’84? I may be... adopting one.

>Does the V6

Does the V6 still

That’s the thing about comments of the day: they’ve already been made on another article today.

I keep my spare in the trunk because you never know when you’ll need to melt some steel beams.

I go back and forth on the “performance street truck” argument more often than a tennis ball at Wimbledon. On the one hand you’ve got a basic tool gussied up to do something it was never intended to do. On the other hand most performance cars aren’t really that practical in the first place. I’d say a performance…

I’d buy it, Sloppy Mechanics LS swap it with a 4.8 truck motor and big duration cam, then make it scream to get the ladies. I could sell the rari motor to someone for god knows how much- because ‘rari. And profit.

It wasn’t a rental, per se, but one time these kids dropped off a 1961 Ferrari 250 GT California at the parking garage I worked at. I knew they were probably playing hooky from high school and it was most likely their parent’s car, so me and a buddy took it for a joy ride around the streets of Chicago. There may have…

BMW’s don’t have to look beautiful. They just have to look expensive. As long as it makes people look successful and affluent they’ll keep buying them (or leasing them I guess).

So, are we not talking about the unicorn in the top shot? I feel like that deserves a comment or two.

I don’t know why you were looking, but you made me go back. I don’t know why it is so funny, but I can’t stop laughing.

I love that he did this, and thank you for mentioning because I didn’t even notice.

The only thing I got out of this article is the fact that you blurred out a dog’s genitalia. So fucking strange.

I’m going to blame this on today being Friday.

Then why would it be connected to the intake?

I don’t have a truck, but SAMES.

I’m sorry, I already own a 944. NEXT!

So you like the guest editor?