Yeah, that seems silly. Why would a person do that? Seems more likely one would be trying to head off the inevitable health comments in the year-in-review post he wrote as part of a DON’T BE A DICK.
Life is Strange.
The whole game was a training exercise, with Raiden / the player as an unwilling participant in a Snake-trainer, modeled after the scenarios in MGS1. It was the first big budget post-modern video game. And it was fantastic.
Unionize!
I’m not sure why anyone would object to developers experimenting with new forms and pushing the boundaries of what a video game can be.
Penny Arcade turned to crap years ago - it’s a late-era-Simpsons parody of itself and about as relatively funny.
I too enjoy pricing human beings out of bodily functions.
So where is the pro-life, “pro-family” movement on this one?
Legend says that Tina left to tend to her cats full time.
We shall put you in charge immediately. I assume I am fired? I’ll pack my things. It was nice briefly working for you.
If anyone is good at holding multiple opposite viewpoints at one time, it’s a conservative Republican.
All they said was one game has $3k worth of DLC when it is on sale. Everything they said was true, the fact that most people only want one or two of the DLC is immaterial to the post. Your comment is trying harder to bait than the post is.
It disappears sexism (real sexism; not “misandry”) as an axis of oppression.