aerwteb
asdfbgf
aerwteb

Yeah, fuck Linda Sarsour!

Take comfort in the fact that there's absolutely no evidence to back that guess up and a significant amount of evidence to the contrary.

If only she'd joined the hordes of other celebrities who endorsed Clinton. One more would've put her over the top.

This is one of the worst articles I've ever seen on this site. Seriously? Who is this guy?

Hands off my popcorn. I've eaten it while watching the artiest of art films as well as the shitty blockbusters he's talking about; popcorn is just good, man. It doesn't discriminate.

Same. I felt exactly the same way.

This was wonderful right up to the last minute and a half. Chloe's presence in that field really hindered what could've been a lovely moment signifying Daniel's renewed self-worth and, instead, proposed the possibility of a new life with a woman the audience barely knows. I never cared about Chloe, and while I

Yeah, this week's gay storyline is indicative of why this material should be written by actual gay people. That was… certainly something.

Of course not and I think that was pretty obvious. All I meant was that he could have accomplished significantly more, despite the occasional stragglers, and he could've beaten them in line if he wanted to.

He's been on the right side of history for 40 years, particularly when it comes to LGBT rights as he was advocating for them back in the 70s. I didn't claim he was perfect; I'm arguing against accepting the mediocrity with which we're so often stuck, politicians who pay lip service to progressive causes and then

I'm not, on either count. I'm talking about the stimulus package President Obama put forth after the 2008 economic collapse. Trump will dismantle that little bit of progress he was actually able to achieve.

It wasn't that he wasn't populist enough; he went up agains the entire democratic and media establishment who ignored/dismissed/mocked his campaign and still received 47% of the delegates. It had to do with the fact that a good portion of the party bought the line that Clinton was more electable and that Bernie was

Those changes are likely to be reversed under Trump's first four years, so not really. President Obama is not a liberal. The largest reason Clinton lost was because she was a widely despised, weak candidate who promised a continuation of the establishment at a time when the American people wanted change. It won't take

Absolutely not. I'm simply arguing that accepting mediocrity when there are better candidates in plain sight is ridiculous. I've heard all of these arguments before (the government isn't designed to change quickly, you just want ideological purity!!!), but at the end of the day, Republicans get what they want done

After Clinton won the primary, I voted and campaigned for her. I'm not saying that we should've tried to hinder her run once she was the nominee; I'm just saying she shouldn't have been the nominee in the first place. If we'd run our own populist (who was actually a populist as opposed to a billionaire pretending to

Trump voters. Seriously.

He "wrote a couple of articles" and presided over a town considered to be a "trans-haven" 40 years before most Democrats came around to publicly endorsing the idea I deserved the same rights as everyone else. That's the argument. The people who show up at the last second to take credit for the decades of work carried

You know that isn't true. His campaign was by no means flawless, but you're perfectly aware of the fact that everyone within the media and the DNC proceeded as if Hillary was already the nominee, barely addressing Bernie's support (which ultimately accounted for a massive 47% of the delegate count even with all of

I'm not saying that everything we hope to accomplish will happen overnight, so I reject the optimistic label, but you're right on everything else. I'm just making the case for passionate and frequent appeals for progress to the party, and that means ignoring their calls for continued centrism and inaction and backing

The stimulus was a temporary fix to a systemic problem. It saved the banks from collapse, but it didn't address any of the substantive problems that led to their collapse in the first place. It will happen again. That's not a victory. Obamacare is likely to be gutted by the GOP-led Congress immediately after they come