The guy doesn't get credit for same-sex marriage, nor does he get credit for paying lip service to trans children and then doing nothing to help them. He just doesn't. He opposed gay marriage for most of his career and while, yes, he appointed the justices that ultimately allowed for it, literally any other democrat…

So, in your mind, there's no way any Democrat could ever have accomplished anything, even with a supermajority. We're giving these guys a pass for literally anything and everything, aren't we?

Look at the issue-by-issue polling. The public is much more liberal than you think. And I wouldn't be so sure about the lifetime of disappointment; once this older generation of neoliberals gets out of the way, mine will actually get something done.

We're much more liberal in general. We aren't okay with neoliberals. It really does come down to policy.

Forgive me, but there were massive fuckups throughout these past eight years. And if we're really fine with the bar being set that low, then god help us.

None of that is even remotely true and if you believe that, I'm sorry, but you're gravely misinformed.

You're assuming quite a bit there. I always vote Democrat, always have (including this election), and have worked on down-ballot races. And, as a relatively young person, allow me to steer clear of that false assertion that young people just abandon the party when it matters; your generation is terrible about that as…

You're right. If we'd just believed a little more, Clinton would've won.

I voted for Clinton, friend.

Not approval; the left's failures helped to facilitate that rise.

Apologies; he had 72 days to pass any piece of legislation he wanted and passed almost nothing. He had two years where Democrats had a majority in Congress and accomplished almost nothing.

Contrary to that nonsense talking point that is often repeated around here, this isn't about purity. It's about recognizing who your representatives actually are and carrying out your basic civic duty in electing those who won't trample on the 4th amendment regarding the surveillance state, who won't contribute to the…

I'm really uncomfortable with the laudatory, "We'll miss you!" sentiment that's sort of manifested in this comment section so far. We have to start demanding more from our representatives and can't give into this bizarre, blind adoration for a guy simply because he was somewhat rational and didn't allow everything to…

How do you nominate Charlotte Rampling for London Spy and not Ben Whishaw? That doesn't make any sense.

So, Esther fucking hates Jennifer Lawrence, huh? This definitely feels like an over-the-top response to a moderately insensitive act (though, do we actually know anything about what these rocks were/what their significance is? If not, how are we supposed to gage just how insensitive this act is anyway? It seems as if…

Regardless, it should.

This has to be the tenth time I've seen a "Weekend Box Office" segment that has erroneously labeled the reception a film received in order to tailor it to the review it got from this site/feed the commentariat's collective appetite for snark. The reviews for Fantastic Beasts weren't "middling".

Thank god someone finally fucking said it.

"Relying far too much on a prop" - That basically sums up her entire run on All Stars.

This was awful, and really buttressed my disappointment with the back half of this season. It all felt wrong and… almost corporate. Pre-destined. Fake. The only positive from this episode was Katya once again proving she's the most interesting queen to have ever been on this show (who's been screwed twice now).