aendron
Aendron
aendron

I mean that race, gender, age and social standing etc. doesn't matter when it comes to questions of whether prejudice is prejudice. The definition is quite clear, after all. People - all people - are biased against these factors in some fashion, and it may negatively impact our judgement to decide what behaviour

What a fair approach.

Well, as a counselling major, I think you'd know better than to draw absolutes. It is certainly wrong to claim that a divorce is never a big deal, but it's also equally wrong to claim that they definitely will be. I should know, my childhood featured 2 divorces, and neither one of them cause any harm, stress or

.... Nah, it's more fun this way.

There are two ways I can respond:

Quite so. I suppose it's the implication that offends them (that their opinion do not matter or hold weight), it's just unfortunate that this kind of misunderstanding happens at all, and that it's so hard to undo once it's been triggered.

Oh no, make no mistake, you're free to like it more and with no explanation or excuse required. I totally respect that and I understand why you'd prefer it, even if I don't personally agree with you. I'm just sharing my own thoughts. Thanks for being civil on the internet, few people are these days :P

Pinwheel is the best Souls character ever. I have spoken!

The upbringing of the girls is a hard case to sell. There's really no telling what being a real life super hero would do to a person, especially since all three of these girls are meant to be kindergarten age (5 years old). In the same way, there's really no way to assume they would be the same as adults - in fact

Fair enough, I can respect that. However - if you'll indulge me for a while longer - I put it to you that the deviant art design is no better, if we're going by their personalities. Here's why:

Contradicting myself? How? By contesting your claim that the characters would be deformed abominations if they were depicted in a serious, realistic fashion? How does that contradict the idea that the cover art design is fairly close to the original design, presented in a Charlie's Angel kind of way? Because that's

Forget the hair, their nails are long enough to be considered lethal weapons at this point o.O

Yes, they do have a very distinct art style, but so what? We still have no good way of knowing for sure because the art style is so diverse and includes so many different different styles for what a human being can look like. In fact, there's no way to differentiate between artistic design - making the chemical x

They're not super deformed, though. At least we have no reason to assume they are. They're illustrated with a minimalistic, and very exaggerated art style, and every character has their own abnormal quirk to them that could easily be described as a congenital disease. Like, there are very few characters that look

I'm not sure 90's super heroes is the correct way to describe it. It seems much more similar to the 60's kind of girl power action stars, like Charlie's Angels, than anything created by 90's comic costume design. The colour coding is very reminiscent of the 60's to begin with. The thigh-high boots might be said to be

I suggest you go back and look at their original designs, and you'll realize just how faithful this generic eye candy really is. The only thing that has been added is thigh high stockings instead of - presumably - tights and gloves. It was always pretty clear that the original characters were wearing dresses, so

This kind of DRM (if it's not a bug) really depresses me, because people who pirate the game will probably not have this problem. So eventually you'll have a product that tries to avoid piracy, by gimping the product and punishing their consumers to the point where some people who bought the game will crack it out of

Jeez, dude. Okay so he was wrong and obviously a fanboy, but I think you're barking up the wrong tree, since he's humping Nintendo's leg here and not Microsoft's. Why even go to such extremes to insult him - and any other xbox fan - like that; you are not contributing to the conversation and the rant comes literally

How is a fighting game deeper than an RPG? Aren't they trying to do vastly different things? As for that matter, wouldn't chess be more like an RPG; a methodical game where you develop your pieces (character), plan ahead, make decisions and so forth? I don't understand your insistence that your chess vs checkers is a

Except I'm not upset - I've only expressed an issue I'm having with your attitude, equating your opinion of something as a representation of its objective quality, an issue - I feel - that is present across all media, regardless if I like it or not.